Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dave F. wrote: > On 28/09/2010 01:11, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F. wrote: >>> >>> But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what was there fifty >>> years ago. >> >> What was there 50 years ago is useful, > > I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - social facility

On 28 September 2010 10:20, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > Caffeine addicts have amenity=cafe Heroin addicts have the injecting room in Kings Cross, would that be leisure=injecting_room? :) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.opens

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

On 28 September 2010 10:38, Dave F. wrote: > If historic data was kept within OSM it would become far to cluttered. Not if this data was filtered by default, and only shown if requested. The present method of showing everything is limiting for a number of reasons. ___

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Roundabout Priority

On 28 September 2010 08:44, Simone Saviolo wrote: > So, "regular" roundabouts (i.e., those that are common, with priority > to the left) are tagged junction=roundabout, and non-standard > right-hand-priority ones are circular ways without the roundabout tag. Wouldn't you just tag them both as jun

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dave F. wrote: >> I disagree. How can it be vandalism if it's not there anymore? > > Because we don't only map what's currently there. To expand on this: http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/old_name/ http://osmdoc.c

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Roundabout Priority

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:51:27 +1000 John Smith wrote: > > So, "regular" roundabouts (i.e., those that are common, with > > priority to the left) are tagged junction=roundabout, and > > non-standard right-hand-priority ones are circular ways without the > > roundabout tag. > > Wouldn't you just

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

On Lunes 27 Septiembre 2010 23:27:18 Sean Horgan escribió: > I prefer wedding_services over wedding_office, as my first thought with > office was one of those Vegas drive-thrus. Either one will still cause > some confusion though. What about "wedding_organization" ? Noel er Envite signature.as

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - social facility

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 17:10, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2010/9/28 Sean Horgan : > > I took a stab at a definition and updated the wiki; let me know what you > > think > "A social facility is any place that focuses on improving the lives of > others." > > that's very generic, while it is true i

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dave F. wrote: On 28/09/2010 01:11, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F. wrote: But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what was there fifty years ago. What was there 5

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Dave F. wrote: > On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> Strawman. We're only talking about former railway alignments. > > Hmm... not sure you understand the meaning of the straw man argument. > > - > > You're (sic) statement "Because we don't only map

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Roundabout Priority

On 27/09/2010 22:36, Colin Smale wrote: I am making a simple proposal of "roundabout=priority_to_right" to indicate a specific non-standard priority arrangement on some roundabouts occurring in some parts of mainland Europe. Please see: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ro

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

On 28/09/2010 02:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Dave F. wrote: On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Strawman. We're only talking about former railway alignments. Hmm... not sure you understand the meaning of the straw man argument. - You're (sic)

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Roundabout Priority

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Dave F. wrote: > Do these genuinely still exist? I thought the French were the only ones to > have these & got rid of them when their roundabouts became gridlocked & the > rest of Europe took the piss out of them. :-) New Jersey (US) has some traffic circles wher

Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Dave F. wrote: > On 28/09/2010 02:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Dave F. wrote: >>> >>> On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Strawman. We're only talking about former railway alignments. >>> >>> Hmm... not su

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

Maybe this just makes it more confusing, but it looks a photographer or a confectioner would be listed using craft: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft There is also shop=confectionery, shop=bakery, shop=florist. Maybe the shop=butcher serves as a good model in cases like this, where it

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

On Martes 28 Septiembre 2010 04:07:10 Sean Horgan escribió: > Maybe this just makes it more confusing, but it looks a photographer or a > confectioner would be listed using craft: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft > > There is also shop=confectionery, shop=bakery, shop=florist. Ma

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

Noel wrote: > That is not at all. I'm not talking about a photographer nor a florist nor >confectionery nor anything of that, but about people who organize weddings: >they >contract in your name with a photographer, a florist, a catering bussines, a >pastry, a restaurant, etc. Perhaps you wan

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

Ok, I was confused by this statement in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:shop: There are shops specialized in providing wedding services: catering, decoration, photographer/videocameraman, illumination, gifts, flowers... In the US, the services you describe are generally performed by a

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

I prefer office=wedding_planner. Craft doesn't sound right but there is definitely some overlap between the examples in craft and office. Sean On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 20:43, Sean Horgan wrote: > Ok, I was confused by this statement in > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:shop: > > The

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

It sounds to me like office=wedding_planner would be the best choice. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Sean Horgan Sender: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:47:58 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Reply-To: "Tag dis

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

On Martes 28 Septiembre 2010 04:47:58 Sean Horgan escribió: > I prefer office=wedding_planner. Craft doesn't sound right but there is > definitely some overlap between the examples in craft and office. AFAIK, Craft is mostly for people who make (and sell) something, Shop for people who sell some

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

office=wedding_planner sounds fine to me. I'm actually going to need one of those pretty soon ;-) On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 21:00, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: > On Martes 28 Septiembre 2010 04:47:58 Sean Horgan escribió: > > I prefer office=wedding_planner. Craft doesn't sound right but there i

Re: [Tagging] community centres

Sean Horgan wrote: > agreed. there should be no restriction on who owns/provides the service. Yes but then we must provide operator=* -- Pierre-Alain Dorange OSM experiences : ___ Tagging mailing list Tagg

<    1   2