Mike Harris
> -Original Message-
> From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Paul Johnson
> Sent: 20 December 2009 22:31
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Cc: t...@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] tagging Gre
Mike Harris
_
From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Steve Bennett
Sent: 21 December 2009 06:21
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] tagging Greenways
Quesion is: is there anythin
Hi
I've slowly started using addr:housenumbers, I'm not really interested
in doing it according to the way the addr:* scheme work atm though..
Because of the amount of work to enter data in that scheme.
Here are the things that I believe is different from the addr:* scheme..
1. I use addr:housen
Hi,
Erik Johansson wrote:
> 1. I use addr:housenumbers, just to get numbers on the map. Even
> though I don't follow the spec.
Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you want.
> Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
Yes, use the same scheme tha
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson
> Hi
>
> I've slowly started using addr:housenumbers, I'm not really interested
> in doing it according to the way the addr:* scheme work atm though..
> Because of the amount of work to enter data in that scheme.
are you aware of JOSM-Presets and autocompletion? If yo
On 21/12/2009 15:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> are you aware of JOSM-Presets and autocompletion? If you work in JOSM
> and use the presets, the street, city and country-tags will be
> autocompleted.
Furthermore if you use JOSM's addressing plugin, you don't have to type
the street name at all
"Randy" writes:
> Martin Fossdal Guttesen wrote:
>>
>>Well i got a list from the postal service over all the postal boxes
>>the list is like this
>>
>>Postal nr | City | where it is | Address
>>
>>and the column "where it is" is an ordinary description of where it
>>is,possible values are attach
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Erik Johansson wrote:
>> 1. I use addr:housenumbers, just to get numbers on the map. Even
>> though I don't follow the spec.
>
> Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you want.
Thanks, that's a good idea (
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, David Earl wrote:
> On 21/12/2009 15:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> are you aware of JOSM-Presets and autocompletion? If you work in JOSM
>> and use the presets, the street, city and country-tags will be
>> autocompleted.
>
> Furthermore if you use JOSM's addres
Erik Johansson wrote:
> Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
Yes: Choose key names for your scheme that aren't already in use and are
clearly different from existing keys.
That is, they shouldn't start with "addr:" - that prefix is commonly
used for tagging addresses in a
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm
> wrote:
> > Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you
> want.
>
> Thanks, that's a good idea (if it works),
what do you mean by: if it works? All alternative ways to the well
established add
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2009/12/21 Erik Johansson
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm
>> wrote:
>> > Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you
>> > want.
>>
>> Thanks, that's a good idea (if it works),
>
> what do
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson
> But it is retrieved in the only way I care about namely the rendered
> map. It could be retrieved by geocoders as well, with small changes,
> it was this change I wanted help with. Note, place=locality seems even
> better after what you said, or do you have a better ta
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Erik Johansson wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
If you know where the other end of the street is, use an
addr:interpolation way, in accordance with the wiki. I think your case
was essentially why addr:interpolation was esta
Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> Never mind simply tagging it loses spatial detail in the process, and
>> complicates routing engines (since turns are often restricted or
>> prohibited from the cycle track across the adjacent road and vice
>> ver
Steve Bennett wrote:
>> Except highway=footway is automatically bicycle=no.
>>
>>
> Depends on the country.
I'm gonna have to disagree... if it allows both pedestrians and
bicycles, that would be a cycleway in most cases.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tag
The property tag covered=yes has been approved, and has been added to the
features list.
--
Randy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
At 2009-12-21 11:01, Roy Wallace wrote:
>... If you don't know where the other end of the
>street is, you can't use an addr:interpolation way, so it seems to me
>that you are just tagging a sign.
>
>Is there already a tagging scheme for this? If not, propose one - but
>(as others have said) don't u
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Depends on the country.
>
> I'm gonna have to disagree... if it allows both pedestrians and
> bicycles, that would be a cycleway in most cases.
>
>
Disagree all you like.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restr
2009/12/22 Paul Johnson :
>
> I'm gonna have to disagree... if it allows both pedestrians and
> bicycles, that would be a cycleway in most cases.
>
Around me, that is not the case. The law where I live is that anybody
is allowed to cycle on any footpath, unless it is otherwise signed, or
there is
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Disagree all you like.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions
>
In the US, highway=pedestrian defaults to bicycle=yes, but highway=footway
defaults to bicycle=no?
Sometimes you just need to ignore t
2009/12/22 Anthony
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
>> Disagree all you like.
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions
>>
>
> In the US, highway=pedestrian defaults to bicycle=yes, but highway=footway
> defaults to bicycle=no?
>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Anthony
>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>>
>>> Disagree all you like.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions
>>>
>>
>> In the US, highway=pedestria
23 matches
Mail list logo
