2009/12/21 Erik Johansson <erjo...@gmail.com> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> > wrote: > > Then why don't you use "place=locality, name=45-29" if that's all you > want. > > Thanks, that's a good idea (if it works),
what do you mean by: if it works? All alternative ways to the well established addressing scheme don't "work". It's easy as that. place=locality is generally used to give names to localities that don't match other established features (can be lots, hills, named localities, etc.), IMHO a locality-node "name=45-29" to express housenumbers is wrong. > >> Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better? > > > > Yes, use the same scheme that everyone else uses as well ;-) > +1 > I don't care about geocoders, I will fix it but I'm not that keen on > getting geocoders to work. as soon as someone else is editing in your area it will be conflicting anyway. I just don't see the point of entering useful information in a way it will not be retrieved... cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
