2009/10/16 Pieren :
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ben Laenen wrote:
>> It obviously failed at that completely. The most used tags
>> (landuse=residential, industrial, farm, commercial, military, retail...)
>> don't
>> give any detail about ground cover. It has become so bad that I don't see
2009/10/16 Anthony :
> Such land is generally designated as "mixed use", or perhaps "mixed
> use X", where X is the primary use of the land. I suppose in some
> situations (apartments over top of retail shops) mapping two landuses
> on the same physical area can be appropriate.
I made a proposal
2009/10/16 Anthony :
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Anthony wrote:
>> Land use is generally studied on a parcel by parcel basis.
>
> A typical example of a land use map:
> http://cityofypsilanti.com/maps/images/mastermap2006www.jpg
in Germany it would be like this:
http://www.stadtentwicklung
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.4749&lon=13.4858&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF
>
I see on this place that sometimes the multipolygon relation is used
for two landuses (forest and recreation_ground) and sometimes not
(forest and brownf
2009/10/17 Pieren :
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.4749&lon=13.4858&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF
>>
>
> I see on this place that sometimes the multipolygon relation is used
> for two landuses (forest and recreation_ground) and
Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Ben Laenen wrote:
> > This is ground cover for example:
> > http://www.ngi.be/Templates/zoom.htm?doctitle=uittreksel&image=../images/
> >1/1/extr10_vismijn.jpg&x=452&y=452
> > http://www.ngi.be/Templates/zoom.htm?doctitle=uittreksel&image=../image
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Didn't find the brownfield, but this would obviously be
> an error, as a brownfield is a construction site, where there were
> buildings before, so it can IMHO not be a forest.
I didn't say "tagging for the renderers". I was more sugg
2009/10/17 Pieren :
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> Didn't find the brownfield, but this would obviously be
>> an error, as a brownfield is a construction site, where there were
>> buildings before, so it can IMHO not be a forest.
>
> I didn't say "tagging for t
