2009/10/17 Pieren <pier...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Didn't find the brownfield, but this would obviously be >> an error, as a brownfield is a construction site, where there were >> buildings before, so it can IMHO not be a forest. > > I didn't say "tagging for the renderers". I was more suggesting > "adding relation multipolygon only when Mapnik does not render landuse > overlaps in the right order".
err, that's exactly tagging for the renderers. Multipolygon doesn't have to do with rendering: it excludes the area inside the inner way from the area surrounded by the outer way. Nothing more. If you use it differently to correct render problems it is an error. > brownfield is here: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.486156&lon=13.484739&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF thank you. This is a little bit complicated object: it used to be an amusementpark in the GDR (Kulturpark Berlin, 1969-1990), was reopened in 1992 as spreepark and reclosed in 2001 (probably fraudulent). Still I don't think - despite quite a lot of trees - that this area is to be considerated a forest. I inserted it into the multipolygon. There was another error: layer=-1 (forest) is not to be set in cases like this. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
