On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.4749&lon=13.4858&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF >
I see on this place that sometimes the multipolygon relation is used for two landuses (forest and recreation_ground) and sometimes not (forest and brownfield). Just because Mapnik is rendering them in the right order (the forest and the brownfield). But this is tagging for current Mapnik styles which is wrong. > It is possible to have a quarry that became landfill and now is covered by > forest. As you say, it's not at the same time a quarry, a landfill and a forest. Of course, we can tag what it was 20 years or 20 centuries ago. And most of landuse values are exclusive. "military" area is the most controversal. A military area can be also overlapping the see. That's why the idea to move it from landuse to a boundary is not so bad. Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
