Am 02.01.2015 um 07:33 schrieb Megha Shrestha:
Do we tag the whole area as owner =* ???
Oh no, please try to avoid this!!! We collect GEO-FACTS in OSM and are
no land title register.
Please also try to take care of privacy concerns.
And think about that the fact needs to be checkable easily by
Thank you all for your suggestions. Was a great help! :)
On Jan 2, 2015 3:44 PM, "Marc Gemis" wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Megha Shrestha
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I think I got the answer. The unused land is
>> the land scheduled for construction purpose. Is this
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Megha Shrestha
wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I think I got the answer. The unused land is
> the land scheduled for construction purpose. Is this suitable to use
> landuse = residential for such property??
>
then the landuse is either brownfield (there were
Thanks for the suggestion. I think I got the answer. The unused land is the
land scheduled for construction purpose. Is this suitable to use landuse =
residential for such property??
Megha Shrestha
Geomatics Engineer
Intern
Kathmandu Living Labs
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-01-02 10:25 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> Landuse=residential ?
+1, but it wouldn't have connotations about the structure (one plot or
several plots or only part of a plot), only on the type of landuse.
> Normally a village/town/city is marked this way.
-1, villages, tow
On 2/01/2015 6:03 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 05:00:24 +
From: Megha Shrestha
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: [Tagging] Tagging private property
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I came ac
Yes, owner may be used on areas (for example I encountered it used on
landuse=forest).
But I think that typically it is not really useful information to tag -
hard to verify,
changes in unnoticeable ways, hard to use (the same owner may be named in
many ways).
Also, legal ownership structure is s
Do we tag the whole area as owner =* ???
On Jan 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Mateusz Konieczny" wrote:
> Is it private as in "restricted access" or is it private as in "owned by
> some individual"?
>
> In the first case I would use access=private on area, in the second I
> would not tag it as
> it is not s
Is it private as in "restricted access" or is it private as in "owned by
some individual"?
In the first case I would use access=private on area, in the second I would
not tag it as
it is not so important and this data is hard to maintain (
BTW, proper tag for this situation would be owner=*).
201
