Yes, owner may be used on areas (for example I encountered it used on landuse=forest).
But I think that typically it is not really useful information to tag - hard to verify, changes in unnoticeable ways, hard to use (the same owner may be named in many ways). Also, legal ownership structure is sometimes overcomplicated for legal purposes (no, it is not owned by city - it is is owned by company A, owned by foundation B that is controlled by city). 2015-01-02 7:33 GMT+01:00 Megha Shrestha <meghashrest...@gmail.com>: > Do we tag the whole area as owner =* ??? > On Jan 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it private as in "restricted access" or is it private as in "owned by >> some individual"? >> >> In the first case I would use access=private on area, in the second I >> would not tag it as >> it is not so important and this data is hard to maintain ( >> BTW, proper tag for this situation would be owner=*). >> >> 2015-01-02 6:00 GMT+01:00 Megha Shrestha <meghashrest...@gmail.com>: >> >>> I came across a problem while tagging private properties of people. >>> There is amenity = school to tag school area but is there any way to tag a >>> land property that belongs to a private owner (household) and contains >>> building within that land. Also how can you tag a private property which is >>> unused? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
