Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-27 Thread Florian LAINEZ
Thanks for your feedback guys. According to tag info, tourism=meeting_point is used 4 times amenity=meeting_point is used 35 times . So the amount is very low for

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-25 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 25 April 2015 at 19:58, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > It's an amenity to me. +1 > And I've used them. +1 -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/list

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-25 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
It's an amenity to me. And I've used them. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-25 Thread Jan van Bekkum
Amenity is definitely better. I used them more as a business traveller than as a tourist. On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:11 PM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Yes, that would be OK. > > On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 06:41:33 +0900 > John Willis wrote: > > > I think the meeting point has a name beyond "meeting poin

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Yes, that would be OK. On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 06:41:33 +0900 John Willis wrote: > I think the meeting point has a name beyond "meeting point", so would > it be okay to name I of it has an actual name beyond its function > (even if it is "East meeting point" or "Exit C8 meeting point" if it > says t

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-25 Thread Volker Schmidt
> However, these meeting points are actually bogus. People do not care where > authorities want them to meet. People meet wherever they like. Even when > people meet at a designated meeting point by accident, they don't say: > "Let's meet at the meeting point." They say: "Let's meet in the lobby."

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 25.04.2015 um 10:27 schrieb Florian LAINEZ : > > tourism=meeting_point or amenity=meeting_point? There are also emergency=meeting_point as part of the fire precautions in some places. Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreet

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-25 Thread Florian LAINEZ
Hi, 2015-04-24 23:41 GMT+02:00 John Willis : > would it be okay to name I of it has an actual name beyond its function > (even if it is "East meeting point" or "Exit C8 meeting point" if it says > that on the sign? I guess yes, as far as it comes with the main tag. I have seen the place=* page

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 24.04.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt : > > You're right. That should just be: > place=meeting_point I don't like place as key here, because places are different kinds of places, the meeting point is a function, has not a name, is nothing besides being defined as meeting point c

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-24 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 24.04.2015 18:18, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> tourism=information > > It makes no sense, as this tag means "Information for tourists and > visitors". And meeting points is something else. > > I would tag it as meeting_point=yes (as it is not only for tourism). I have only seen it in touristic

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-24 Thread John Willis
The very large train stations in Tokyo have traditional meeting points, as a popular one would be near the Hachiko statue in Shibuya. I believe they are signed. I think the meeting point has a name beyond "meeting point", so would it be okay to name I of it has an actual name beyond its functi

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-24 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:00:34 -0700 > Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > > place=meeting_point > > name=Meeting Point > > > > Place is used for all sorts of named places, both governmentally > > sanctioned and not. > > name is for names, not for

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-24 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:00:34 -0700 Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Florian LAINEZ > wrote: > > > > > >- tourism=meeting_point > >- meeting_point=yes > >- tourism=information and information=meeting_point > > > > The last one is my favourite for now ... any ide

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-24 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:34:54 +0200 Florian LAINEZ wrote: > tourism=information It makes no sense, as this tag means "Information for tourists and visitors". And meeting points is something else. I would tag it as meeting_point=yes (as it is not only for tourism). __

Re: [Tagging] Meeting point

2015-04-24 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Florian LAINEZ wrote: > > >- tourism=meeting_point >- meeting_point=yes >- tourism=information and information=meeting_point > > The last one is my favourite for now ... any idea? > Thanks > The tourism=information + information=meeting_point has the a