The very large train stations in Tokyo have traditional meeting points, as a popular one would be near the Hachiko statue in Shibuya. I believe they are signed.
I think the meeting point has a name beyond "meeting point", so would it be okay to name I of it has an actual name beyond its function (even if it is "East meeting point" or "Exit C8 meeting point" if it says that on the sign? Javbw > On Apr 25, 2015, at 5:11 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:00:34 -0700 >> Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: >> >> > place=meeting_point >> > name=Meeting Point >> > >> > Place is used for all sorts of named places, both governmentally >> > sanctioned and not. >> >> name is for names, not for describing functions > > You're right. That should just be: > place=meeting_point > > Perhaps, thought it really is not needed in most cases: > operator=Big Convention Hall > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
