Hi, 2015-04-24 23:41 GMT+02:00 John Willis <jo...@mac.com>:
> would it be okay to name I of it has an actual name beyond its function > (even if it is "East meeting point" or "Exit C8 meeting point" if it says > that on the sign? I guess yes, as far as it comes with the main tag. I have seen the place=* page on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Places and it doesn't look at all like an appropriate tag to use : it is for cities, suburbs and neighbourhood. I agree that a meeting point is not about information so let's forget about tourism=information + information=meeting_point Therefore, even if a meeting point is not only about tourism but best choice we now have is tourism=meeting_point isn't it? With the optional tags it would be: tourism=meeting_point name=Meeting point A operator=You name it Good for you guys? 2015-04-25 9:35 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Am 24.04.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: > > > > You're right. That should just be: > > place=meeting_point > > > I don't like place as key here, because places are different kinds of > places, the meeting point is a function, has not a name, is nothing besides > being defined as meeting point > > cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- *Florian Lainez* @overflorian <http://twitter.com/overflorian>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
