Liz napsal(a):
> On Sat, 15 May 2010, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote:
>> and the last,
>> most puzzling is landuse=basin "An area of water that drains into a
>> river."...
>>
> wow, there are some pretty huge ones of those
> like the Amazon basin
> the Lake Eyre basin
> the Mississipi basin
> the f
2010/5/17 Pieren :
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>>
>> I'm kind of considering if this is right or not - if a road is the divider
>> between two landuses, is it still best to unglue it from the landuse(s) and
>> move it into one or the other?
>>
>
> It's best to unglue b
2010/5/16 Zeke Farwell :
> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>>
>> IMHO yes, as natural is mainly about landcover (what you physically
>> encounter on the spot) while landuse is about usage.
>
> If you want do some extremely detailed mapping you might make a lot of
> d
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Pieren wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm kind of considering if this is right or not - if a road is the divider
>> between two landuses, is it still best to unglue it from the landuse(s) and
>> move it into one or the oth
Personally I'm starting to use multipolygons more and more - define a
"boundary" once and reuse is as many times as needed by the landuses
either side.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Pieren
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>
> I'm kind of considering if this is right or not - if a road is the divider
> between two landuses, is it still best to unglue it from the landuse(s) and
> move it into one or the other?
>
>
It's best to unglue but it's also not wrong to g
>
>
> * Unglue roads that share borders with landuses and move them into the
> "correct" one (a residential road into the residential area etc).
>
>
I'm kind of considering if this is right or not - if a road is the divider
between two landuses, is it still best to unglue it from the landuse(s) and
think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
-Original Message-
From: Cartinus
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 18:21:53
To:
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Landuse border alignment
On Sunday 16 May 2010 18:11:47 Anthony wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> > On Su
On Sunday 16 May 2010 18:11:47 Anthony wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
> > > Also, is it OK that natural overlaps landuse? It kind of has to be,
> > > since it's used a lot to place brushes or tree-areas i
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>
> > Also, is it OK that natural overlaps landuse? It kind of has to be, since
> > it's used a lot to place brushes or tree-areas inside larger landuses.
>
> Sure. If a forest crosse
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
> Also, is it OK that natural overlaps landuse? It kind of has to be, since
> it's used a lot to place brushes or tree-areas inside larger landuses.
Sure. If a forest crosses a fenceline, then it overlaps. I did
something like that here:
ht
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO yes, as natural is mainly about landcover (what you physically
> encounter on the spot) while landuse is about usage.
>
If you want do some extremely detailed mapping you might make a lot of
different no
2010/5/16 Jonas Minnberg :
> Also, is it OK that natural overlaps landuse? It kind of has to be, since
> it's used a lot to place brushes or tree-areas inside larger landuses.
IMHO yes, as natural is mainly about landcover (what you physically
encounter on the spot) while landuse is about usage.
So the common problem I have here in Stockholm is that most residential
areas in the suburbs have been "carved" out of wood- and grass-areas so
there is always a mish-mash between those three.
Is the correct way to split up all those landuses in smaller parts so they
never overlap?
Also, is it OK
On Sat, 15 May 2010, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote:
> and the last,
> most puzzling is landuse=basin "An area of water that drains into a
> river."...
>
wow, there are some pretty huge ones of those
like the Amazon basin
the Lake Eyre basin
the Mississipi basin
the fill_in_any_large_river basin
s
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer napsal(a):
> On the other hand: I would like to see this mess tidyed up. In this
> case I suggest to first change (extend) render rules and then
> encourage people to change tagging. This is all because of tagging for
> the renderers: because it is sad to tag "correct" and you d
2010/5/15, John Smith :
> On 15 May 2010 06:27, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>>> >> Oh and I forgot:
>>> >> * landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
>>> >
>>> > Are you mixing up landuse and land cover by any chance?
>>>
>>>
>>> you're insisting on this one? Yes, you are right: in
On 15 May 2010 06:27, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>> >> Oh and I forgot:
>> >> * landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
>> >
>> > Are you mixing up landuse and land cover by any chance?
>>
>>
>> you're insisting on this one? Yes, you are right: in traditional
>> geoscience landuse
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:50 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/5/14 John Smith :
> > On 15 May 2010 05:27, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
> >> Oh and I forgot:
> >> * landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
> >
> > Are you mixing up landuse and land cover by any chance?
>
>
> yo
2010/5/14 John Smith :
> On 15 May 2010 05:27, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>> Oh and I forgot:
>> * landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
>
> Are you mixing up landuse and land cover by any chance?
you're insisting on this one? Yes, you are right: in traditional
geoscience land
Well the area around where I live is a wonderful mish-mash of overlapping
landuses, and many roads sharing nodes with landuse-borders and I think it's
too much work to get it straight for now...
In the case of the grass/forest overlap: That was a grassy-looking area
containing houses (so actually
2010/5/14 Jonas Minnberg :
> OK, some real world examples;
> * Two overlapping wood-areas, one named, the other not.
Generally it's a good idea to tidy up your area, given you know the
area, so in this case: either you know the extent of the named area in
real life, or you shouldn't touch it.
>
On 15 May 2010 05:27, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
> Oh and I forgot:
> * landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
Are you mixing up landuse and land cover by any chance?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.ope
2010/5/14 Jonas Minnberg :
> Oh and I forgot:
> * landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
is this inside a building or are there platforms or what is the
purpose of this layer-tag?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@
Oh and I forgot:
* landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>
> OK, some real world examples;
>
> * Two overlapping wood-areas, one named, the other not.
>
> * Grass inside grass landuse, rock inside grass landuse etc -
OK, some real world examples;
* Two overlapping wood-areas, one named, the other not.
* Grass inside grass landuse, rock inside grass landuse etc - is the rule
that wholly interior (possibly sharing nodes with the exterior) areas are
always rendered on top of its exterior area?
__
* Jonas Minnberg [2010-05-14 16:39 +0200]:
> What about bordering buildings - ie buldings sharing walls but having
> different addresses/uses ? Is it better to draw the as a single area or as
> separate but with shared nodes?
I feel that separate ways that share nodes along the joint wall makes t
Jonas Minnberg wrote:
>
> When is it OK to remove an overlapping landuse ? In some places I
> found 3 overlapping landuses and it's not clear which one has priority...
When you have visited the area and found out what the real landuse is?
Cheers, Chris
___
2010/5/14 Jonas Minnberg :
> What about bordering buildings - ie buldings sharing walls but having
> different addresses/uses ? Is it better to draw the as a single area or as
> separate but with shared nodes?
IMHO the more you can separate them, the better. Usually I would
expect (in a "final" s
29 matches
Mail list logo
