Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-26 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
doug brown Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:43:36 +0100 From: a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com To: dougc...@hotmail.com CC: a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes Updated. On 2013-01-22 20:33, doug brown wrote : Thanks André. I got th

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-24 Thread fly
On 22/01/13 16:19, SomeoneElse wrote: > Philip Barnes wrote: >> >> What OS are you running? A fellow UK mapper was recently unable to revert >> using windows, however the reversion worked for me running on fedora linux. >> >> > For completeness the error that I (the other UK mapper) was getting on

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
On 2013-01-22 13:37, doug brown wrote : Thanks all for the feedback you have provided on the tags for the shrimp pond dikes. I hope to be able to implement many of these changes soon, but I have not been successful in using the JOSM Reverter plugin. The OSM Wiki states: "After installing th

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread SomeoneElse
Philip Barnes wrote: What OS are you running? A fellow UK mapper was recently unable to revert using windows, however the reversion worked for me running on fedora linux. For completeness the error that I (the other UK mapper) was getting on that occasion was "java.lang.NullPointerExceptio

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread doug brown
I'm using Widows 7. From: p...@trigpoint.me.uk To: tagging@openstreetmap.org CC: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:52:37 + Subject: Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes What OS are you running? A fellow UK mapper was recently unable to revert using windows, howeve

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread Philip Barnes
en trying to update OSM (cancel the update and open Windows>Conflict). Good luck, André. Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:32:47 +0100 From: a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com To: tagging@openstreetmap.org CC: dougc...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes As I have not r

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
tagging@openstreetmap.org CC: dougc...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes As I have not received my copy of this, I resend. Sorry for possible duplicates. On 2013-01-19 16:43, doug brown wrote : In the past couple of years I have spent several tens o

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread SomeoneElse
doug brown wrote: I have updated to the latest JOSM version (version 5608) and downloaded the plugin and restarted JOSM multiple times, but no History menu item appears. Subsequent attempts to download the reverter plugin yield a message that all plugins are up to date. In my experience af

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread doug brown
No, it doesn't work. I had tried that idea earlier as the result of a discussion thread I had located via a google search. Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:43:02 +0100 From: imagic@gmail.com To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes Try pre

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread Martin Vonwald
Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:32:47 +0100 > From: a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > CC: dougc...@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes > > > As I have not received my copy of this, I resend. Sorry for possible > duplicat

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-22 Thread doug brown
lugins are up to date. I'm out of ideas on how to proceed. Does anybody have any advice? Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:32:47 +0100 From: a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com To: tagging@openstreetmap.org CC: dougc...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-21 Thread fly
On 19/01/13 16:43, doug brown wrote: > In the past couple of years I have spent several tens of hours digitizing the > shrimp pond dikes in San Blas Municipio, Nayarit, Mexico. They are a > significant feature on the local landscape and of importance because of the > degradation they are causing i

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-20 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
As I have not received my copy of this, I resend. Sorry for possible duplicates. On 2013-01-19 16:43, doug brown wrote : In the past couple of years I have spent several tens of hours digitizing the shrimp pond dikes in San Blas Municipio, Nayarit, Mexico. They are a significant feature on th

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-19 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, doug brown wrote: > In the past couple of years I have spent several tens of hours digitizing > the shrimp pond dikes in San Blas Municipio, Nayarit, Mexico. They are a > significant feature on the local landscape and of importance because of the > degradation th

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-19 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
On 2013-01-19 16:43, doug brown wrote : In the past couple of years I have spent several tens of hours digitizing the shrimp pond dikes in San Blas Municipio, Nayarit, Mexico. They are a significant feature on the local landscape and of importance because of the degradation they are causing in

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 19/gen/2013 um 16:43 schrieb doug brown : > 1) Is this tagging scheme appropriate, and if not, what changes should I make? what about using service instead of unclassified? Didn't look at the actual map, did you add the ponds themselves as well? The name is a "description", I'd rather pu

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-19 Thread Michael Krämer
Hi Doug, Am 19.01.2013 16:44 schrieb "doug brown" : > The tags I used on these features are as follows: > > access = private > embankment = yes > highway = unclassified > man_made = dike > name = shrimp pond dike > > My reasoning being that all of the dikes have, at a minimum, a footpath on top of

Re: [Tagging] Dispute concerning shrimp pond dikes

2013-01-19 Thread Pieren
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:43 PM, doug brown wrote: > 1) Is this tagging scheme appropriate, and if not, what changes should I > make? Perhaps replace the "highway=unclassified" by "footpath" when it's a footpath and maybe "track" if it is wide enough for just one car. > 2) Is there a way to rol