sent from a phone
> Am 06.01.2016 um 17:41 schrieb Colin Smale :
>
> The three types of vehicles shown on the sign in the original post are all
> HGVs. The differences are in the vehicle configuration - standalone, with a
> semitrailer and with a "proper" trailer. So it would need to be somet
The three types of vehicles shown on the sign in the original post are
all HGVs. The differences are in the vehicle configuration - standalone,
with a semitrailer and with a "proper" trailer. So it would need to be
something like maxweight:hgv:notrailer=X, maxweight:hgv:semitrailer=Y,
maxweight:hgv
you should specify the maxweight for all vehicles distinctly, e.g.
maxweight:hgv=
maxweight:bus=
+1
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:31 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Am 30.12.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Jack Burke :
> >
> > What's the right way to specify maxweight when the wei
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Looking at the photo in the original post, it looks like the categories
> are a bit more specific than "hgv" - possibly articulated/semitrailers vs.
> drawbar trailers, possibly based on the number of axles. What is the
> proper/legal defintio
The Florida Trucking Manual [1] (page 10) explains the categories thus:
_The maximum allowable weight is listed in tons beside the silhouette
for each of the three classes of vehicles._
_The SINGLE-UNIT TRUCK silhouette includes all straight trucks, cranes,
and other single-unit special mobile
sent from a phone
> Am 30.12.2015 um 19:58 schrieb Marcos Oliveira
> :
>
> Do you know if this is a legal limit or if being smaller makes the weight
> less spread out which can structurally damage the bridge?
that's always legal limits, structurally it will take 2-4 times more, but you
sho
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 14:58 +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Philip Barnes wrote on 2015/12/31 14:44:
> >
> > They all seem to apply to hgv, but to me it looks like an axle
> > weight
> > limit of just over 6t, but signed in a very odd way.
> >
> > 13 / 2 = 6.5
> > 19 / 3 = 6.
> > 25 / 4 = 6.25
>
Philip Barnes wrote on 2015/12/31 14:44:
They all seem to apply to hgv, but to me it looks like an axle weight
limit of just over 6t, but signed in a very odd way.
13 / 2 = 6.5
19 / 3 = 6.
25 / 4 = 6.25
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxaxleload
I would take the worst case and tag
Looking at the photo in the original post, it looks like the categories
are a bit more specific than "hgv" - possibly articulated/semitrailers
vs. drawbar trailers, possibly based on the number of axles. What is the
proper/legal defintion of the vehicle categories that the symbols
represent?
Don'
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 14:30 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Am 30.12.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Jack Burke :
> >
> > What's the right way to specify maxweight when the weight limit
> > sign has different values for different vehicles? Just use the
> > highest value show
sent from a phone
> Am 30.12.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Jack Burke :
>
> What's the right way to specify maxweight when the weight limit sign has
> different values for different vehicles? Just use the highest value shown?
you should specify the maxweight for all vehicles distinctly, e.g.
maxwe
On 30 December 2015 18:58:38 GMT+00:00, Marcos Oliveira
wrote:
>Do you know if this is a legal limit or if being smaller makes the
>weight
>less spread out which can structurally damage the bridge?
>
>If the first then I'd map the highest value, if the latter then the
>smallest one.
I dont thi
Marcos Oliveira wrote on 2015/12/30 19:58:
Interesting case, the bridge can seemingly resist 25 short tons, yet for
smaller vehicules it takes less.
Do you know if this is a legal limit or if being smaller makes the weight less
spread out which can structurally damage the bridge?
As the brid
Split values are somewhat frequent in the US. Oklahoma and Oregon
definitely has different weight limits posted for bridges for straight
vans, single trailers, doubles (or some road train combinations like
triples, turnpike doubles, Rocky Mountain doubles...).
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Ma
Interesting case, the bridge can seemingly resist 25 short tons, yet for
smaller vehicules it takes less.
Do you know if this is a legal limit or if being smaller makes the weight
less spread out which can structurally damage the bridge?
If the first then I'd map the highest value, if the latter
What's the right way to specify maxweight when the weight limit sign has
different values for different vehicles? Just use the highest value shown?
For example, see this bridge:
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xCvKHzGbfqBG0sZDCVUV8A/photo
--jack "weighing all my options"
16 matches
Mail list logo
