pet=permissive? although if the operator does straight out say 'pets
allowed' without any further suggestion (be it images, small print or
whatever) I guess it would be yes until proven otherwise or further
explained/surveyed. if this does get put in an article it may be worth
noting that it's
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 18:11, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
We should strive for least specific tagging restrictions necessary to
> describe what we want.
> pet=no (generally no animals allowed)
> dog=yes (but dogs are)
> bird=yes (birds as well)
> parrot=no (but parrots not)
> etc.
>
> For allowance
Am Fr., 8. März 2019 um 18:56 Uhr schrieb seirra blake <
sophietheopos...@yandex.com>:
> I'm guessing it depends on how specific the authority is.
>
good point. We should strive for least specific tagging restrictions
necessary to describe what we want.
pet=no (generally no animals allowed)
dog=
I'm guessing it depends on how specific the authority is. on the one
hand you'd think it'd usually just be either birds or no birds however I
imagine the distinction may still crop up. as I can't actually see any
article saying about animals used as access tags, I imagine it's just
tag as you s
sent from a phone
> On 7. Mar 2019, at 22:58, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Presently they are tagged as per access tagging.
> motor_vehicle=yes/no
> horse=yes/no
> dog=yes/no
> ferret=yes/no
> parrot=yes/no
> etc
so birds should get individual tags based on family or species?
bu
then I guess it might have to be pets? it isn't necessarily ideal, but
it is a lot more specific than nothing at all. from what has been said
though, it looks like pet=yes/pet=no may be more appropriate as species
are already specified in the singular form (as well as most other access
tags I c
I never saw that in access before, but that actually makes a lot of
sense. conditionals are somewhat underutilised where I live so I always
forget about them, but that's a fair point
On 3/7/19 9:58 PM, Warin wrote:
On 08/03/19 00:07, seirra blake wrote:
while I can't see a problem with a tag
If it is import data (can you link its documentation page on the OSM wiki?)
then it certainly should not add blindly "dogs" unless it was defined this way
in source data.
10% wrong is completely unacceptable for imports.
Mar 7, 2019, 11:27 PM by cascaf...@gmail.com:
> Unfortunately dataset I'm
Unfortunately dataset I'm manually importing has a boolean "pets" field.
I guess if go for "dogs" it will be 9/10 right, while a generic "pets"
99/100 (considering the alligator anomaly :-) The latter has less taginfo
popularity, but better fits source data.
Il gio 7 mar 2019, 14:09 seirra blake
On 08/03/19 00:07, seirra blake wrote:
while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still make
more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace species/related
things under it similar to the access tag. use cases I can think of:
* pets=no | no matter what, no pets
* pets=y
while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still make
more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace species/related things
under it similar to the access tag. use cases I can think of:
* pets=no | no matter what, no pets
* pets=yes | open to all or at least most pets other
On Thursday, 7 March 2019, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Many shops and a few restaurants in my town display a sign somewhere saying
> that dogs
> are allowed.
>
Some pubs make dogs very welcome by providing biscuits and water bowls.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Sailfish device
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 12:05, wrote:
> Pets is probably a bit vague, many hotels will accept pet dogs, but are
> less likely to accept cats and extremely unlikely to my pet alligator (no
> I don't really own one).
>
Some holiday cottages accept dogs but place a limit on the number (only
one; a m
Pets is probably a bit vague, many hotels will accept pet dogs, but are less
likely to accept cats and extremely unlikely to my pet alligator (no I don't
really own one).
Maybe search for dogs rather than pets.
Obviously dogs=no will only apply to pets, registered assistance dogs are
covered
Hello ML!
how can I tag and hotel (or whatever) that allows pets? Besides, semi-OT,
if hotel offers babysitting, is childcare=yes ok?
I briefly googled in OSM wiki and couldn't find. If already answered,
please forgive me.
___
Tagging mailing list
Taggi
15 matches
Mail list logo
