On 08/03/19 00:07, seirra blake wrote:
while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still make more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace species/related things under it similar to the access tag. use cases I can think of:* pets=no | no matter what, no pets * pets=yes | open to all or at least most pets other than specified examples such as... * pets:dogs=no | dogs that are pets are not allowed, a guide dog does not necessarily count as a pet or at least, I don't think of one as being a pet. * pets:cats=1 | only one cat allowed
Presently they are tagged as per access tagging. motor_vehicle=yes/no horse=yes/no dog=yes/no ferret=yes/no parrot=yes/no etc
this does still make it vague in the sense that if only one cat is allowed, is it per party or per person, but this probably could be made more specific with another tag namespaced under pets (my mind is blank, I haven't eaten yet. however this feels like the best approach to cover most situations). this may also be useful for things like water-bowls/treats for pets as mentioned elsewhere here; for example: my bank offers dog biscuits for dogs, the train station used to offer a water-bowl as well, but I haven't put much thought into seeing if it's there after the take over by LNER.
Where a quantity limit applies ? dog:1= yes @ per party ???
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
