If it is import data (can you link its documentation page on the OSM wiki?) then it certainly should not add blindly "dogs" unless it was defined this way in source data.
10% wrong is completely unacceptable for imports. Mar 7, 2019, 11:27 PM by [email protected]: > Unfortunately dataset I'm manually importing has a boolean "pets" field. > I guess if go for "dogs" it will be 9/10 right, while a generic "pets" 99/100 > (considering the alligator anomaly :-) > The latter has less taginfo > popularity, but better fits source data. > > Il gio 7 mar 2019, 14:09 seirra blake <> [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > ha scritto: > >> >> while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still make >> more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace species/related things >> under it similar to the access tag. use cases I can think of: >> >> pets=no | no matter what, no pets >> pets=yes | open to all or at least most pets other than specified >> examples such as... >> pets:dogs=no | dogs that are pets are not allowed, a guide dog does >> not necessarily count as a pet or at least, I don't think of one as >> being a pet. >> pets:cats=1 | only one cat allowed >> >> this does still make it vague in the sense that if only one cat is >> allowed, is it per party or per person, but this probably could be made >> more specific with another tag namespaced under pets (my mind is blank, >> I haven't eaten yet. however this feels like the best approach to cover >> most situations). this may also be useful for things like >> water-bowls/treats for pets as mentioned elsewhere here; for example: >> my bank offers dog biscuits for dogs, the train station used to offer a >> water-bowl as well, but I haven't put much thought into seeing if it's >> there after the take over by LNER. >> >> On 3/7/19 12:17 PM, Paul Allen wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 12:05, <>>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Pets is probably a bit vague, many hotels will accept pet dogs, >>>> but are less likely to accept cats and extremely unlikely to >>>> my pet alligator (no I don't really own one). >>>> >>> >>> Some holiday cottages accept dogs but place a limit on the >>> number (only one; a maximum of two; etc.) >>> Yes, some do accept cats, and there are many cat owners who >>> would love to be able to take their >>> cat on holiday with them. So it would be nice if we had >>> something a little more flexible than >>> dog=yes/no. >>> >>> >>>> Obviously dogs=no will only apply to pets, registered >>>> assistance dogs are covered by the law of the country, in the >>>> UK a hotel/pub/restaurant is not allowed to refuse assistance >>>> dogs. I assume the same is true throughout the EU. >>>> >>> >>> I believe that, in the UK, NO business can refuse assistance >>> dogs (but I could be wrong). It's also >>> the case in the UK that non-assistance dogs are NOT legally >>> prohibited from pubs and >>> restaurants but only from food preparation areas: it's the >>> owner's decision as to whether or not >>> dogs are allowed where food is served and sold. See >>> https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/our-resources/kennel-club-campaigns/be-dog-friendly/ >>> >>> <https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/our-resources/kennel-club-campaigns/be-dog-friendly/> >>> >>> Many shops and a few restaurants in my town display a sign >>> somewhere saying that dogs >>> are allowed. >>> >>> -- >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>>> >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
