That's just wishful thinking. They all came up with Overture Maps precisely
to focus on a more data-driven approach and avoid the whole
community-consensus debate. If they wanted a round-table talk with us, they
would have organised it themselves long ago.
Just take their MR challenges for what th
TomTom has created the same challenge for the Netherlands:
https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/37471
Just days before that challenge was created, I had a discussion on Discord
with some other Dutch mappers. I thought it would be easy to tag all
remaining highway=motorway without a surface ta
@Daniel Bégin
You're welcome. Good luck and happy mapping!
Op wo 18 jan. 2023 om 23:45 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 18 Jan 2023, at 19:25, Daniel Bégin wrote:
> >
> > I just wrote: “I used office=construction_company because it's the on
@Marc_marc You make a good point, but I see it more as a way of linking
tags, as you suggested before.
That said, I hadn't noticed that the tag office=construction_company is
already documented and in use, so I guess that would be a good tag to use.
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffi
Hello. I suggest that you have a good look at the following pages:
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Joto/How_to_invent_tags
Going through a proposal process isn't always necessary; you can just
document your tag and give it the stat
Site relations are usually completely redundant if you just tag an
operator=* tag. A tourism=camp_site closed way or multipolygon is,
of course, a camp site, and a shop or parking area on or belonging to
that camp site should get an operator=* tag with the same tag value as the
name or operator of
I am pleased to announce that the proposal for `castle_type=citadel` has
been approved with ten votes for, 1 vote against and 1 abstention.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Citadel
I am now going to document the approved tag on the relevant Wiki page(s)
and then I'll probably
@Marc_marc
- limit to 1 simultaneous proposal per person?
I oppose this idea. Sometimes people just have plenty of free time and good
ideas and use this to make and share proposals. I see no reason to hinder
them.
- limit this to active contributor status in the osmf sense?
I strongly oppose th
Voting is now open:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Citadel#Voting
Op ma 3 okt. 2022 om 22:53 schreef Casper Kersten :
> P.s. Citadels and fortresses were complementary for a city's defence, but
> do not always coexist. Also, some fortresses have been
As I mentioned on the community forum, the historic=* key is full of tags
that should really need to be revisited, changed or redefined before they
can be voted on. I strongly advise against approving all historic=* tags en
masse.
Elaboration on the community forum:
https://community.openstreetmap
P.s. Citadels and fortresses were complementary for a city's defence, but
do not always coexist. Also, some fortresses have been (partially)
demolished but the citadel have been left largely intact, as is the case in
Lille, France.
Op ma 3 okt. 2022 om 22:49 schreef Casper Kersten :
>
y the same thing.
Op ma 3 okt. 2022 om 22:38 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> Am Mo., 3. Okt. 2022 um 22:30 Uhr schrieb Casper Kersten <
> casperkerst...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I just created a proposal page to tag citadels:
>> https://w
I just created a proposal page to tag citadels:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Citadel
The proposed tag is castle_type=citadel.
All feedback is welcome. Feel free to share it here, but I prefer to
discuss the proposal on the Community Forum and on the discussion page on
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
