Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Mar 31, 2023, 01:53 by ajt1...@gmail.com: > On 30/03/2023 18:13, NKA mapper wrote: > >> tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 18:14 skrev Andy Townsend <>> >> ajt1...@gmail.com>> >: >> >>> >>> How do I know if an "amenity=charging_station" in theOSM >>> data is a "single charge poin

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Mar 30, 2023, 18:14 by ajt1...@gmail.com: > On 30/03/2023 09:25, NKA mapper wrote: > >> The definition of >> amenity >> >> =>> charging_station >> >>  will >> change slig

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread NKA mapper
fre. 31. mar. 2023 kl. 01:54 skrev Andy Townsend : > If the same tag must be used for both, the only way to tell "single charge > point" from "group of chargers" is to have a tag that is set to indicate > which is which. If "newtag=single" it means it's a single charge point, if > "newtag=group"

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Peter Elderson
I think: A charging_station has one or more chargers. You cannot count the number of chargers by counting charging_stations. Since you can't assume that all charging_stations have their capacity (number of chargers) in a tag, nor that chargers are separately mapped (in addition, or standalone), nor

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Andy Townsend
On 30/03/2023 18:13, NKA mapper wrote: tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 18:14 skrev Andy Townsend : How do I know if an "amenity=charging_station" in the OSM data is a "single charge point" or a "group of chargers"? The intention is to not have a difference. Both a single charger location and a

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread NKA mapper
tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 18:14 skrev Andy Townsend : > How do I know if an "amenity=charging_station" in the OSM data is a > "single charge point" or a "group of chargers"? > The intention is to not have a difference. Both a single charger location and a multi-charger location is a place where you c

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Andy Townsend
On 30/03/2023 09:25, NKA mapper wrote: The definition of amenity =charging_station  will change slightly and will represent both locations with a single charge point and locatio

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread NKA mapper
tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 16:11 skrev Marc_marc : > For years we will end up with a tag with two meanings: the old and > the new and it will be impossible to review the old tag since part > of the new meaning (amenity=charging_station = a site of > man_made=charging_station) uses the same tag as the

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Mar 30, 2023, 16:11 by marc_m...@mailo.com: > Le 30.03.23 à 12:43, Lionel Giard a écrit : > >> we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where >> there is one or more fuel pump. >> > > in no case did amentiy=fuel designate a pump and then be changed > to designate al

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Mar 30, 2023, 10:50 by marc_m...@mailo.com: > Hello, > > Le 30.03.23 à 10:25, NKA mapper a écrit : > >> The definition of amenity=charging_station will change slightly and will >> represent both locations with a single charge point and locations with a >> group of chargers. A new optional fea

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Marc_marc
Le 30.03.23 à 12:43, Lionel Giard a écrit : we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where there is one or more fuel pump. in no case did amentiy=fuel designate a pump and then be changed to designate all the pumps in the same location. it you really want to have a

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Lionel Giard
The idea behind clarifying the amenity=charging_station for a place where there is one or more charge points, is that we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where there is one or more fuel pump. Also most of the time for charging station in my area, it was already tagge

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread Marc_marc
Hello, Le 30.03.23 à 10:25, NKA mapper a écrit : The definition of amenity=charging_station will change slightly and will represent both locations with a single charge point and locations with a group of chargers. A new optional feature, man_made=charge_point will be created to separate detail

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-03-30 Thread NKA mapper
Currently, some users create one amenity =charging_station node (or area) to represent a charging location, regardless of the number of charging points at the location. Other users