The idea behind clarifying the amenity=charging_station for a place where there is one or more charge points, is that we use the same idea for amenity=fuel where it just shows the place where there is one or more fuel pump. Also most of the time for charging station in my area, it was already tagged assuming that.
And it also seems logical to use "man_made" category to tag the individual charge points as we do for fuel pumps. At least, it would just be consistent between various similar tagging schemes. Regards, Lionel Le jeu. 30 mars 2023 à 10:47, Marc_marc <marc_m...@mailo.com> a écrit : > Hello, > > Le 30.03.23 à 10:25, NKA mapper a écrit : > > The definition of amenity=charging_station will change slightly and will > represent both locations with a single charge point and locations with a > group of chargers. A new optional feature, man_made=charge_point will be > created to separate detailed mapping of each charge point from the main > amenity amenity>=charging_station feature at locations. > > I disapprove the idea of changing the meaning of "in use" tag. > we already have what you want : > - a charging station : amennity=charging_station > - a site of charging station relation type=site > > Regards, > Marc > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
