stevea writes:
> We agree. The issues are both around the different behavior of the
> (Carto) renderer when both landuse=residential and natural=wood are
> combined (and there are highly complex ways they can be and are
> "combined" in the OSM database), and around how mappers understand
> these
On 3/6/20 5:37 am, Florian Lohoff wrote:
For me overlapping natural or landuses are broken. An area can either
be a natural=wood or a landuse=farmland. You cant include the same
area in two types of usages or naturals.
You can.
Farm land here can have trees to shelter animals from wind/sun an
Jun 4, 2020, 16:00 by vinc...@bergeot.org:
> Le 04/06/2020 à 15:49, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
>
>> You have right to use your own images, AFAIK there is also a special
>> permission
>> for OSM mapping but otherwise images are owned by them.
>>
>
> mapillary picture are CC-BY-SA, you
Because such lists are generally harder to understand, harder to edit,
mostly theoretical - such exact matches do not really occur in reality
and such lists are not supported (both editor programs and data consumers).
Jun 4, 2020, 16:06 by ravilac...@gmail.com:
>
> Why not landuse=forest;meadow i
Hmm, yes. I agree with you that covered_by would not fit it, but we still have the thing that some mappers would be ok with extending the key covered=* with more specific values and others won't. But as I see it, covered still has some other values than yes/no exactly for this thing (covered=arcade
Hi Clifford,
Our images get linked to osm object as per the wiki page .. they are added
after manual curation using either the tag image, mapillary or
wikimedia_commons depending on where the image is stored.
We developed the workflow because our users found the workflow below to be
suboptimal :
I would like to add another interesting one. A railway that never has
been finished completely, but you can clearly see it on the map,
nonetheless: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/51.0885/6.6486
Most of it is still visible, not only in the bigger picture. It's build
as embarkment in large pa
Don't we already have https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Photo_linking which
is how to add photos for objects?
--
@osm_washington
www.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists
Dear Janko,
I have been dialoging with Christopher Beddow, Edoardo Neerhut, and Fredrik
Glans at Mapillary over the past couple of months. While all three of them
have shown enthusiasm, single-snap images are just not a priority at this
point for Mapillary.
Yes, I confirm - nearby images whether
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 14:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Jun 4, 2020, 14:51 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>
>
> The author of iD is one of the mappers who doesn't like it. So much so
> that he
> removed that option from the preset for phone=*. Unless you can pe
> I almost never found a photo of something I was looking for with OsmAnd's
> "close by Mapillary photos"
I agree
I realise this thread was initially about buildings but when I’m using OsmAnd
to find, for example, a public transport ticket machine at an airport, I want
to see a photo of the mac
>
> Is it really necessary? "give image for location [lat, lon] from direction
> X" seems a
> basic functionality for service like Mapillary.
>
I almost never found a photo of something I was looking for with OsmAnd's
"close by Mapillary photos". I think Osmand only takes Mapillary photos x
meters
Why not landuse=forest;meadow in one only polygon ?
Cheers,
Rafael.
O 04/06/20 ás 15:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging escribiu:
Jun 4, 2020, 10:50 by ravilac...@gmail.com:
This is interesting. But what if the (for example) silvopasture
would occupy exactly the same area fo the lan
Le 04/06/2020 à 15:49, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
You have right to use your own images, AFAIK there is also a special
permission
for OSM mapping but otherwise images are owned by them.
mapillary picture are CC-BY-SA, you can use pictures and download them
without pay nothing.
Jun 4, 2020, 10:50 by ravilac...@gmail.com:
>
> This is interesting. But what if the (for example) silvopasture would
> occupy exactly the same area fo the landuse=forest and the
> landuse=meadow?
>
>
Exactly the same? Rare but it can be tagged. Create a closed way, and make a
two
Jun 4, 2020, 14:51 by pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 12:35, Lukas via Tagging <> tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> 1. covered=booth for closed phone-boxes, but some mappers do not really like
>> that.
>>
>
> The author of iD is one of the mappers who doesn't like i
Jun 4, 2020, 14:54 by jan...@gmail.com:
> does this community think this would be ridiculous or not?
>
Mapillary has images geolocated anyway, so if someone wants to use Mapillary it
seems
unnecessary.
> Would Mapillary be the right service to host the photos?
>
No. Note https://www.mapillary
Hi,
On 2020-06-04 14:54, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I think having a photo of every building, as well as other features like
> public sculptures, memorials, bus stations would be very useful. You
> would be able to click a building, and know what it looks like.
I would not want us to encourage and su
Hello,
Le 04.06.20 à 13:33, Lukas via Tagging a écrit :
> the question is whether key covered=* is suitable for this.
> Or should we stay with a stricter covered=yes/no
> and maybe add something like covered_by=phone_hood or something?
key=yes/no with some more specific value is the common logic
I think having a photo of every building, as well as other features like
public sculptures, memorials, bus stations would be very useful. You would
be able to click a building, and know what it looks like.
I had an idea to make an app that shows you a map, and you would click on a
building, take a
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 12:35, Lukas via Tagging
wrote:
>
> 1. covered=booth for closed phone-boxes, but some mappers do not really
> like that.
>
The author of iD is one of the mappers who doesn't like it. So much so
that he
removed that option from the preset for phone=*. Unless you can persua
Hi,
as some public telephones might get removed in these days, in many countries we still have some. Also many of them are covered but in different kinds of. Now I'm thinking about how to tag the different types of a telephone cover. I mean, a closed phone box is different from for example just a
Jun 4, 2020, 10:59 by f...@zz.de:
>
> Hi Mateusz,
>
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:19:10PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>> You can have forested military base with wetland (real case).
>>
>> You can probably find military base (landuse=military) with landuse=farmland.
>>
>> There
Hi Mateusz,
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:19:10PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> You can have forested military base with wetland (real case).
>
> You can probably find military base (landuse=military) with landuse=farmland.
>
> There are residential areas in forests, there are indu
This is interesting. But what if the (for example) silvopasture would
occupy exactly the same area fo the landuse=forest and the
landuse=meadow? Of course we could handle this with a new tag
landuse=silvopasture. But for other cases? Would it be good to have to
exact different way, one with eac
It seems to me the discussion is now about three points:
1. landfill vs. spoil_heap: In Czechia these two are considered two
distinct landscape elements. The heaps climb above the horizon and due to
(typically) sharp slopes and plateau on top, they are easy to distinguish
from a natural hill so I
26 matches
Mail list logo