Hi Mateusz, On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:19:10PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > You can have forested military base with wetland (real case). > > You can probably find military base (landuse=military) with landuse=farmland. > > There are residential areas in forests, there are industrial zones in > military bases, > there are railway areas in military bases. > > etc etc > > You will have overlapping areas or stuff like > landuse=military_industrial_area_under_tree_cover_with_intermittent_wetland
If you have a residential area in a forest - Is that area used for
residential or for forestry purposes?
Isnt that a landuse=residential with landcover=forest?
IMHO a square meter has ONE predominant usage and thats what we tag. It
might be that there are trees in my backyard - still its a residential
area. People try to map the trees and use landuse=forest for that but
thats simply broken.
I have seen people map every single backyard with landuse=grass,
landuse=meadow, leisure=common or leisure=park which is completely bogus.
Its still a residential area its just grass growing there.
So i am still standing on the issue that there can only be ONE usage of
an area. I could agree on that a military area could contain a
natural=beach, or a wetland - but still landuse may not overlap landuse
and natural not natural. Its either a residential or miliary or
industrial or commercial or forest.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
