Jun 4, 2020, 14:54 by jan...@gmail.com: > does this community think this would be ridiculous or not? > Mapillary has images geolocated anyway, so if someone wants to use Mapillary it seems unnecessary.
> Would Mapillary be the right service to host the photos? > No. Note https://www.mapillary.com/pricing You have right to use your own images, AFAIK there is also a special permission for OSM mapping but otherwise images are owned by them. Uploading images on a free license to Wikimedia Commons is strictly preferable in case of manual making images of important objects. For dumps of automated imagery, Mapillary seems acceptable if there is no open alternative. But given their model I am not planning to work for them for free and I am not enthusiastic about them. > I thought I would suggest this same functionality to OsmAnd because they > already use Mapillary to show close by photos of a feature, but now I'm not > sure if OSM would even want this. I think this would be a big advantage over > other map databases. > Is it really necessary? "give image for location [lat, lon] from direction X" seems a basic functionality for service like Mapillary.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
