Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

On Nov 30, 2015, at 5:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> - it is not landuse=commercial for selling of the flowers, as they are for >> display, > > > wouldn't that be landuse=retail anyway? Oops - yes, if the land is the place where you choose your product, like a pumpkin patch or someth

Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

In the context you are describing (park, garden) these would be "landuse=flowerbed". There is no size restriction. I.e. They may look like an "open field". There appears to be a wiki entry for this tag already. If it is farmland being used to grow ornamental flowers for display then it would

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

On 1/12/2015 12:05 PM, Dominic Coletti wrote: I appreciate the feedback and was able to check out the Taginfo. One solution I saw was shop=charity. One thing that could be used is shop=charity and type=adoption_agency or something similar. The problem of the office (or shop) tag describing the

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

I appreciate the feedback and was able to check out the Taginfo. One solution I saw was shop=charity. One thing that could be used is shop=charity and type=adoption_agency or something similar. The problem of the office (or shop) tag describing the whole building would be tagging a node on the buil

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

On 30/11/2015 22:20, Tom Pfeifer wrote: Yes. Anyway, the proposal is a bit complicated for a simple thing as the value of an office key. Nobody objected. From my perspective, just document it and use it. That makes sense to me. Don't try and overthink what keys other mappers might want to us

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

Alberto Chung wrote on 2015/11/30 22:51: Hi, nice proposal, but i think you can improve some tags, like > "The adoption agency proposal would be tagged building=commercial.", > i guess is better use "building=civic". No, as said before, remove it completely. There is no need that the office tag

[Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

Hi, nice proposal, but i think you can improve some tags, like "The adoption agency proposal would be tagged building=commercial.", i guess is better use "building=civic". Also, you can add the "operator=*" tag (the city, state, any NGO...) Enviado con MailTrack

Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

Javbw > On Nov 30, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Dudley Ibbett wrote: > > leisure=garden I am mapping inside gardens/parks, and I have basically all the tags I need - walkways, hedges, trees, grass, fountains, walls, steps, greenhouses, drinking fountains, toilets, fences, gates - everything - except t

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bicycle_repair_station

On 30/11/2015 06:15, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: Any quick comments on this schema, before I write it up? amenity=self_serve_tool_station brand=Dero Fixit operator=Metro Country Trails opening_hours=24/7 self_serve_tool_station:bicycles=yes self_serve_tool_station:snow_sports=no

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bicycle_repair_station

On 30/11/2015 5:15 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: Any quick comments on this schema, before I write it up? amenity=self_serve_tool_station brand=Dero Fixit If more than one band use ';' to separate? operator=Metro Country Trails opening_hours=24/7 self_serve_tool_station:bicycl

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

The "orphaned" has been removed, but I feel as if adult adoptions are typcially not handled through an agency and therefore the "children"is fine as is. I also feel as if the tag is similar to the tag office=realtor or similar. I feel as if the building=* tag is acceptable because of this. On Mon,

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Level:ref=*

2015-11-29 22:05 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole : > I would rather be looking for something that fits in with SIT ( > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging) better. > I don't see why this doesn't integrate. E.g. your example shop=supermarket level=0 could have the tags added: level:re

Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

2015-11-29 22:49 GMT+01:00 John Willis : > > too specific for landuse > > - It is man-altered from natural=* for a specific use (cleared of all > natural vegetation and planted with a man-chosen display of flowers) > > - it is not landuse=farmland > +1 - it is not landuse=commercial for sellin

Re: [Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

sent from a phone > Am 30.11.2015 um 01:50 schrieb Dominic Coletti : > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/tag:adoption_agency > This proposal serves as a way to tag places where prospective parents can > adopt orphaned children I would remove the word "orphaned", unsure a