W dniu 01.09.2015 2:20, Warin napisał(a):
I and I suspect many others are not familiar with indoor mapping ..
and the wiki does not help the beginner here. But the simple mapper
wants a tag to describe the building= .. without going into the
details of what is inside, the levels, roof ... they w
On 31/08/2015 9:41 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:29:45 +0100
"Dave F." wrote:
What's a 'trolltag'?
It is not OK to use one tag (for example amenity=hotel) and add second
tag that negates or massively change its meaning (for example adding
involuntary=yes to amenity=hotel
On 1/09/2015 6:38 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
W dniu 31.08.2015 21:37, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
or different objects:
A
building:part=supermarket
level=-1
B
building:part=office_block
level=0-6
A 'good idea'.
This should be much easier to parse - and it's also 3D friendly.
Current Simple
On 31/08/2015 11:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 30.08.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Severin Menard :
Is there a way to tag properly buildings mixing residential and commercial uses
(typically shops on the basement opening on the street)?
What's the building typology? Shape
On 31/08/2015 11:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 31.08.2015 um 00:58 schrieb John Willis :
As these are so different from the multi-floor urban-mixed 3-25 story apartment
buildings with shops
3 storey buildings are normally quite different to 25 storey buildings for
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> 3 storey buildings are normally quite different to 25 storey buildings for
> various reasons (e.g. safety regulations, usage intensity, ...)
Is there some easily understood dividing line between a "building" and a
"high-rise bu
W dniu 31.08.2015 21:37, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
or different objects:
A
building:part=supermarket
level=-1
B
building:part=office_block
level=0-6
This should be much easier to parse - and it's also 3D friendly. Current
Simple 3D Buildings specification basically tells to slice the b
sent from a phone
> Am 31.08.2015 um 14:17 schrieb Tod Fitch :
>
> Completed, the look of the buildings is pretty recognizable from the street
> with the fairly tall retail floor below and shorter floors of obvious
> residential above. I guess it could be confused with a badly designed urban
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:55:27 +0200
> moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
>
> > On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > > Is there some method to automate finding who introduced tags? Doing
> > > it manually would not be worth the effort. On the other han
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:11:58 +0200
Volker Schmidt wrote:
> This is the old "use singular" rule for OSM tags, of which I don't
> know the origins and I don't know whether it applies here. In the
> English language a "woodchip surface" is made from "woodchips". So
> one could argue for either versi
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:55:27 +0200
moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > Is there some method to automate finding who introduced tags? Doing
> > it manually would not be worth the effort. On the other hand -
> > running script to detect users (and/or relevant cha
This is the old "use singular" rule for OSM tags, of which I don't know the
origins and I don't know whether it applies here. In the English language a
"woodchip surface" is made from "woodchips". So one could argue for either
version I suppose.
Anyway:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leis
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:27:33 +0200
Éric Gillet wrote:
> In the "Numbers" section, you should correct the second bulletpoint
> as it states "amount of surface=dirt" instead of "amount of
> surface=woodchips"
Done, thanks.
___
Tagging mailing list
Taggi
That's why I would prefer a generalized life cycle tagging scheme in the
form of a prefix. (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix)
For example "disused:highway=cycleway".
It would eliminate the need for data consumers to filter for more tags than
you need. If you just look for cyclewa
On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Good
> luck with filtering out proposed=yes, abandoned=yes, vacant=yes,
> demolished=yes, construction=yes, empty=yes, ruins=yes, parsing
> start_date and end_date etc etc.
Case in point: have a look at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/
sent from a phone
> Am 31.08.2015 um 00:58 schrieb John Willis :
>
> As these are so different from the multi-floor urban-mixed 3-25 story
> apartment buildings with shops
3 storey buildings are normally quite different to 25 storey buildings for
various reasons (e.g. safety regulations, us
sent from a phone
> Am 30.08.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny :
>
> For example, how one is supposed to tag building constructed as church,
> that is used now for commercial purposes?
I d say it depends how the building appears now after the conversion. In doubt
I'd use church.
chee
sent from a phone
> Am 30.08.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Severin Menard :
>
> Is there a way to tag properly buildings mixing residential and commercial
> uses (typically shops on the basement opening on the street)?
What's the building typology? Shape? How many floors? Courtyard/s? Adjacent
buil
W dniu 31.08.2015 14:17, Tod Fitch napisał(a):
So building=apartments obviously is not accurate. Nor is
building=retail. Apartments here are considered commercial so I could
see a mapper using building=commercial even though OSM would frown on
that. It makes sense to me to tag that building styl
Agree with the edit - change soil to dirt. Soil is a word commonly used for
potting soil in the U.S. You will also sometimes see the phrase "night
soil", an older but once common euphemism for human waste.
FWIW, in my part of the U.S. any road that was unpaved was commonly
referred to as a dirt ro
In my area there are a number of new buildings either recently completed or
still under construction that can only be described as a mixed use type: The
street level is steel and concrete construction and designed specifically for
retail. Above that are 3 to 5 wood framed floors specifically des
Hi,
On 08/31/2015 01:41 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> It is not OK to use one tag (for example amenity=hotel) and add second
> tag that negates or massively change its meaning (for example adding
> involuntary=yes to amenity=hotel instead of using amenity=prison).
> Additional tags should clarify
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 7:11 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
>> Totally agree, I support this edit.
>
> +1, also the definition of 'dirt' should be improved in the wiki (currently
> referring back to 'ground'), and 'soil' should be written into the wiki as
> deprecated
> and not to be used.
>
> tom
+
Thank you for clarifying. I wanted to be sure of your meaning before
replying:
Your suggestion of decreasing the road class is "trolltaging" Please
don't do that. Lane closures or access restrictions etc, does not change
a road's classification.
Please refrain from inventing words such as 't
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:29:45 +0100
"Dave F." wrote:
> What's a 'trolltag'?
It is not OK to use one tag (for example amenity=hotel) and add second
tag that negates or massively change its meaning (for example adding
involuntary=yes to amenity=hotel instead of using amenity=prison).
Additional tag
On 31/08/15 11:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:35:24 +0100
"ajt1...@gmail.com" wrote:
There are 32 in the UK, by only 2 mappers (both still active but
edits are from many years ago). Extrapolating that there have only
been probably only 25 mappers using this tag worldwid
On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Is there some method to automate finding who introduced tags? Doing it
> manually would not be worth the effort. On the other hand - running
> script to detect users (and/or relevant changesets) may be a good idea.
curl -s
'http://overpass-api.de/api/int
On 31/08/2015, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> I would be careful here - 'dirt' is essentially a very vague term which
> probably originates from the concept of 'dirt roads' here. 'Soil' in
> the other hand is fairly precise, see
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil
>
> Only parts of the earth surfa
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:35:24 +0100
"ajt1...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>
> On 31/08/2015 10:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a
> > clear duplicate of surface=dirt.
>
> Are you planning to contact the original mappers explaining why, if
>
Matthijs Melissen wrote on 2015-08-31 11:47:
On 31 August 2015 at 11:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny/surface%3Dsoil_to_surface%3Ddirt
I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a clear
duplicate of surfa
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:51:38 +0200
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> On Monday 31 August 2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > See
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny
> >/surface%3Dsoil_to_surface%3Ddirt
> >
> > I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=so
On Monday 31 August 2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> See
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny
>/surface%3Dsoil_to_surface%3Ddirt
>
> I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a
> clear duplicate of surface=dirt. It is also less popular and
> u
On 31 August 2015 at 11:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> See
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny/surface%3Dsoil_to_surface%3Ddirt
>
> I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a clear
> duplicate of surface=dirt. It is also less popular and un
On Monday 31 August 2015, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On behalf of the proposal author, I would like to introduce you to
> the following proposal, which intends to formalize the area:highway
> tag:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area
This proposal has - as a tagging prop
On 31/08/2015 10:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a clear
duplicate of surface=dirt.
Are you planning to contact the original mappers explaining why, if
they're still using it, using the same tag to represent the same thing
makes se
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
>
> The Gardiner is reduced to 2 lanes (was 3), the speed limit is lowered and it
> is causing huge traffic jams.
if it is still a motorway, it is a motorway. reduce the lanes and the maxspeed,
adjust the alignment of the motorway to be
W dniu 31.08.2015 7:54, Tobias Knerr napisał(a):
On behalf of the proposal author, I would like to introduce you to the
following proposal, which intends to formalize the area:highway tag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area
The idea to use areas tagged as area:high
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think it better to bite the bullet and start sub tagging correctly ... thus
> for a retail mixed with apartments
I would still like to separate mixed use buildings there there are multiple
disparate tenants per building
What about
building=apartments
building:use=residential;commercial (or retail)
building=mixed doesn't seem to me to be a useful building tag. The building
tag should describe the type of building, not its use.
Cheers
On Monday, August 31, 2015 10:26:27 AM Warin wrote:
> On 31/08/2015 8:58 AM
39 matches
Mail list logo
