On 2015-08-14 13:50, Ruben Maes wrote :
> On 14 August 2015, Papou wrote on the wiki[1]:
>
>> There were discussions related to this in other Tagging@ threads without
>> follow-up before the vote.
>> My disregarded remarks were:
>> * to introduce the tag precisely as:
>>healthcare=blood_donati
sent from a phone
Am 14.08.2015 um 15:07 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>>> If the building is not primarily the shop
>>
>> can you give an example where a building is the same as a shop (i.e. a
>> business)?
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364872652,
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27280814
On 11.08.2015 19:13, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Personally I prefer sidewalk=none. No implies not allowed
That's not at all the case, as evidenced by the use of "no" or "yes"
with keys such as cycleway, building:part, and flags like
button_operated, segregated, lit, tactile_paving, the recycling keys
On Friday 14 August 2015 14:55:09 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Am 14.08.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Ruben Maes :
> >
> > If the building is not primarily the shop
>
> can you give an example where a building is the same as a shop (i.e. a
> business)?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364872652,
htt
sent from a phone
> Am 14.08.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>
> If the building is not primarily the shop
can you give an example where a building is the same as a shop (i.e. a
business)?
> , you tag the building with building=* and place a node inside with just the
> shop tags.
t
On 14 August 2015, Papou wrote on the wiki[1]:
> There were discussions related to this in other Tagging@ threads without
> follow-up before the vote.
> My disregarded remarks were:
> * to introduce the tag precisely as:
>healthcare=blood_donation is an attribute tag that indicates that the
Hi Mateusz,
In OSM we can't prevent mappers to use undocumented values (nor
undocumented keys actually).
I don't see any other applicable value for this new key than "yes"
If you see any better solution, just share.
All the best
François
*François Lacombe*
fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com
