On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:54 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
>
>>There are some like that, maybe a concrete or tarmac base so tent
> The amenity=caravan_site was indeed invented for what amounts to a
> parking lot for overnight use by RV's.
Do you mean tourism=caravan_site (14K uses v. 1 use)?
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:17 PM, David Bannon
wrote:
>
> > I haven’t been in a RV/caravan only type campground
>
> There are some like that, maybe a concrete or tarmac base so tent pages
> a problem, maybe operator/owner just wants self contained campers.
>
> I'd suggest for this purpose we t
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:22 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> It has been many years since I last went tent-camping, but my
> experience of campgrounds in the US national park system was numbered
> poles marking each campsite, a grassy area for pitching a tent, and a
> charcoal grill mounted on a st
It has been many years since I last went tent-camping, but my experience of
campgrounds in the US national park system was numbered poles marking each
campsite, a grassy area for pitching a tent, and a charcoal grill mounted on a
steel pole. You weren't allowed to cut brush or to have a fire on
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
>
> It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover
> camps organised for profit and by non-profits would be
> leisure=vacation_camp.
I don't think 'vacation' or 'leisure' are good terms at all. A lot of
people use t
The core question is: should this be a top level tag:
leisure=camp_site
leisure=communal_activity_camp
leisure=caravan_site
Or subtags:
leisure=camp_site
caravans=dedicated
tents=yes
communal_activity_camp=no
sanitary_dump_station=no
leisure=camp_site
operator=Girl
On 5 May 2015 at 13:35, Marc Gemis wrote:
>> No, not everybody is against mechanical edits, not even a majority.
> pretty hard to tell when not all mappers were questioned or bothered to
> reply, not ?
If people choose not to (or are "not bothered to") comment, that's an
abstention.
Indeed, it
Hi,
On 05/04/2015 01:07 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> The problem is that there is a very vocal minority against mechanical
> edits, and that minority is of the opinion that a majority cannot
> approve mechanical edits if there is a minority that disagrees.
I think that if the majority of people
I think we can nibble away at this for 'some time' not achieving much by
going round in circles too much. Can we look at the camp problem on a wiki
page where we can all chip in - by listing every different kind of camp we
can think of and categorising each whether leisure, commercial, individual,
>
>
> No, not everybody is against mechanical edits, not even a majority.
>
>
pretty hard to tell when not all mappers were questioned or bothered to
reply, not ?
please do not try to draw such conclusions without hard numbers. it does
not help your cause for mechanical edits.
regards
m.
It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover camps
organised for profit and by non-profits would be leisure=vacation_camp. This
simply generalises summer, and avoids the very specific British connotations
associated with holiday_camp. This does not precisely cover things l
2015-05-05 11:01 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
> At a "campground" each camper is free to organize their time among their
> own group.
> At scout, military and summer camp there is a scheduled program campers
> are expected to participate in.
>
OK, agree, but still it would be bad tagging because it
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> organised_camp doesn't add any information compared to "camp", any kind of
> camp will be organised. (medical camp, refugee camp, detention camp, summer
> camp, military camp, ...)
>
Sure it adds information.
At a "campground" each c
2015-05-05 3:25 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . :
> > Too big a jump, I think. Bearing in mind it is under leisure, how about
>> 'organised_camp' ?
>> >
>>
>> May want to hold that for something else. . .
>>
>>
> Such as ?
>
organised_camp doesn't add any information compared to "camp", any kind of
camp w
Do we really need to tag activity type?
Religion, sports, or operator should take care of it.
There's not a a lot of Buddhism practice at my school camp (any at all?), nor
would I expect religion to be the activity - it is merely the operator or the
thing in common. I bet the people at the J
15 matches
Mail list logo
