2013/12/7 Peter Wendorff
> IMHO the whole area may be a residential area, and residential includes
> residential highways, houses, small parks and much more,
> But I wouldn't say the whole area is a garden, so a garden should only
> be tagged where there is a garden or mainly a garden.
> In addit
2013/12/6 Severin MENARD
> Hi,
>
> Is there a tag for archbishopric or archbishop's palace? And beyond, for
> any tag related to religious administrative offices?
>
for the latter you could use some office-tag and add religion=*
denomination=* etc.
the former should be inserted with the admin_
IMHO the whole area may be a residential area, and residential includes
residential highways, houses, small parks and much more,
But I wouldn't say the whole area is a garden, so a garden should only
be tagged where there is a garden or mainly a garden.
In addition a single garden is a single garde
Am Freitag, den 06.12.2013, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> > Am 06/dic/2013 um 13:39 schrieb cracklinrain :
> >
> > Well, I would say a stone garden without plants is probably still a
> > garden. But an area made of concrete is still a (small) yard or else. If
> > it's too strange i
Hi,
Is there a tag for archbishopric or archbishop's palace? And beyond, for
any tag related to religious administrative offices?
Sincerely,
Severin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Am 06/dic/2013 um 14:20 schrieb SomeoneElse :
>
> In this case, there doesn't seem to me much mapping of the concept, and
> where it has been mapped, military_surplus seems to have been most used, so
> I'd just use that.
+1, but adding docu to the wiki in order to encourage uniform taggin
On 06/12/2013 02:05, Masi Master wrote:
I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private)
ground in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees,
sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in the O
For example to render view of city from OSM data also data about private
gardens, trees, swimming pools etc are necessary.
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 04:26:18 -0800 Matthijs Melissen
wrote
I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden, swimmi
> Am 06/dic/2013 um 13:39 schrieb cracklinrain :
>
> Well, I would say a stone garden without plants is probably still a
> garden. But an area made of concrete is still a (small) yard or else. If
> it's too strange it should be tagged as artwork maybe.
>
> But by definition it seems that the as
On 06/12/13 13:20, SomeoneElse wrote:
Axelos wrote:
The wiki is not intended to suggest tags to make homogeneous the
database ?
The wiki's an excellent place for documenting tag usage, but one of
the things hugely in OSM's favour is that there's no enforced "list of
legal tags" - if someth
2013/12/6 Axelos :
> Hello
>
> Le 05/12/2013 12:16, SomeoneElse a écrit :
>
>> Axelos wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used
>>> military equipment.
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus
>>
>>
>> If you think that it makes sense to t
Axelos wrote:
The wiki is not intended to suggest tags to make homogeneous the
database ?
The wiki's an excellent place for documenting tag usage, but one of the
things hugely in OSM's favour is that there's no enforced "list of legal
tags" - if something has never been tagged before, or no
Hello
Le 05/12/2013 12:16, SomeoneElse a écrit :
Axelos wrote:
I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used
military equipment.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus
If you think that it makes sense to tag a particular shop that way
just go ahead and u
:-)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 06/12/2013 12:32, nounours wrote:
I think we should tag private backyards with "surveillance=yes", even
if surveillance is executed by a satellite et not a surveillance camera.
:-) nounours77
Am 05.12.2013 um 18:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2013/12/5 Wol
Am 06.12.2013 13:26, schrieb Matthijs Melissen:
> I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden,
> swimming pool) is private is in itself useful information for the general
> public. You might for example see a parking or garden on aerial imagery,
> and wonder if it's possible
I think we should tag private backyards with "surveillance=yes", even if
surveillance is executed by a satellite et not a surveillance camera.
:-) nounours77
Am 05.12.2013 um 18:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> 2013/12/5 Wolfgang Hinsch
> how should it be tagged? Is it ok to tag the whol
I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden,
swimming pool) is private is in itself useful information for the general
public. You might for example see a parking or garden on aerial imagery,
and wonder if it's possible to go there.
Related question: if someone decides to pa
Am 06.12.2013 13:09, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> What is the argument for putting the house, the entrance and the private
> way then? IMHO we can map private trees, and I also like to map private
> swimming pools. Of course you can map private fences, walls etc., and why
> not map a private wate
2013/12/6 Masi Master
> I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private) ground
> in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
> IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees,
> sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in the OSM database.
Am 06.12.2013 um 02:05 schrieb Masi Master:
> I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private) ground in
> a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
> IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees,
> sandboxes or playgrounds at the backy
20 matches
Mail list logo