On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Sam Vekemans
wrote:
> Hi,
> You might want to ask the talk-ca list... instead of tagging list :)
>
Why would I want to subscribe to talk-ca just to ask a tagging question?
>
> It's the default value for CanVec when the data is not available.
So why is it being imp
... and the reason for having a '0' was to show where (geometrically)
it will be.
So if people do know what the housenumber range actually is (or want
to extrapolate it from statsCan) they are welcome to.
cheers,
Sam
On 12/20/10, Sam Vekemans wrote:
> Hi,
> You might want to ask the talk-ca lis
Hi,
You might want to ask the talk-ca list... instead of tagging list :)
It's the default value for CanVec when the data is not available.
Every 6 months, the source data (as Natural Resources Canada made .osm
files) gets updated.
So more provinces will have housenumbers, in time :)
... the 1st p
There are a lot of ways in Canada like
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/71852646 that have
addr:housenumber = 0 at both ends. Is this a bad import or legitimate
way of tagging?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openst
As the concept of "disused" could apply to millions of different things,
I would prefer to see a more generic system which could be applied
uniformly. I would like to see the "life_cycle" tag resurrected
(proposed in 2008) something like this:
life_cycle=planned (only exists on paper)
l
It is not uncommon for stretches of old highways to become private roads if
existing driveways still connect to them, or to be closed to motor traffic but
be used as hiking or bicycle trails. The latter usage is particularly common
with old bridges.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [T
I'm afraid I don't see the problem with highway=disused. It's clear
what it means by analogy with railway=disused (there's something
remaining, most likely pavement, but it's no longer a usable highway).
Alternately highway=service (or something else, though most
classifications don't apply to disu
On 20/12/2010 22:23, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I came across http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Disused_road
today. I applied the proposal page template, indicating that the proposal had
been obsoleted, as noted in the commentary on the page. Looking at the tag
info for
I came across http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Disused_road
today. I applied the proposal page template, indicating that the proposal had
been obsoleted, as noted in the commentary on the page. Looking at the tag
info for highway (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/highwa
On 20-12-2010 22:29, Wyo wrote:
Hmm, no remarks at all. Now what shall i do next to get this into
renderers?
In the case of mapnik: wait. The current version used on osm.org cannot
rotate symbols, and we haven't transitioned to the yet-to-be-released
mapnik2 either.
--
Lennard
___
Wyo wrote:
> Hmm, no remarks at all. Now what shall i do next to get this into
> renderers?
Write and submit good-quality patches for Mapnik itself, osm2pgsql and the
standard stylesheet. I believe Mapnik itself isn't yet capable of rotated
icons (see slide 8 at
http://www.slideshare.net/steve8/m
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
>> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Alan Mintz
>> Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:46 AM
>> To: Tag discussion, strategy and
Wyo wrote:
I've set up a proposal for rendering locks on waterways in Mapnik/Osmarender.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Rendering_locks_in_Mapnik
Rendering lock on waterway seems to me a rather important feature when planning
holidays nearby. Locks are not only important t
yvecai wrote:
In any case, for routing it is better to keep a way waterway=canal in
the middle, no?
Sure, any type of waterway. Some add a tag "boat=yes" albeit I don't think its
sufficient since boats can be any size. There's a german article in Wikipedia
which describes them better (http://d
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> I'm wondering why we still are trying the whole "describe the route on
> the way" method of handling the ref= tag on ways.
Because it is currently the only way to get any kind of highway shield
rendered. Get relation-based shield rendering
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> the way's ACTUAL reference number.
Meaning?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
16 matches
Mail list logo
