... and the reason for having a '0' was to show where (geometrically) it will be. So if people do know what the housenumber range actually is (or want to extrapolate it from statsCan) they are welcome to.
cheers, Sam On 12/20/10, Sam Vekemans <acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > You might want to ask the talk-ca list... instead of tagging list :) > > > It's the default value for CanVec when the data is not available. > Every 6 months, the source data (as Natural Resources Canada made .osm > files) gets updated. > So more provinces will have housenumbers, in time :) > ... the 1st priority is roadnames. > > > ..... but alas, this is OSM, and it is possable to remove it. > > > Or is it? > > > Thanks, > Sam > > > On 12/20/10, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There are a lot of ways in Canada like >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/71852646 that have >> addr:housenumber = 0 at both ends. Is this a bad import or legitimate >> way of tagging? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > -- > Twitter: @Acrosscanada > Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ > http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans > Skype: samvekemans > IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) > @Acrosscanadatrails > -- Twitter: @Acrosscanada Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans Skype: samvekemans IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) @Acrosscanadatrails _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
