Re: [Tagging] Snowshed voting

2010-03-15 Thread Andreas Labres
On 15.03.10 16:42, Sam Vekemans wrote: > The proposal of > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/snowshed Do you mean an avalanche gallery (German "Lawinengalerie", something like http://images.google.com/images?q=Lawinengalerie), a technical structure that protects from avalanches,

Re: [Tagging] Snowshed voting

2010-03-15 Thread Richard Welty
On 3/15/10 11:42 AM, Sam Vekemans wrote: > Hi all, > The proposal of > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/snowshed > is still underway, there are a couple of 'yes votes'. > I think http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:covered%3Dyes is more > appropriate. (and it's already diff

Re: [Tagging] Snowshed voting

2010-03-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2010/3/15 Sam Vekemans : > Hi all, > The proposal of > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/snowshed > is still underway, there are a couple of 'yes votes'. 1 (one) to be precise ;-) cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@open

[Tagging] Snowshed voting

2010-03-15 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi all, The proposal of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/snowshed is still underway, there are a couple of 'yes votes'. I think http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:covered%3Dyes is more appropriate. (and it's already different than tunnel=yes) Please add your vote & reasons

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-ca] FW: Canvec Product - osm format

2010-03-15 Thread Bégin , Daniel
Hi all, Sam wrote: "So the wiki [...] needs to be grayed out & a notice put at the top indicating this." I do not want to see it "grayed out" - I'm not imposing something here - I think the first line of each pages is clear enough about what it is ... About the way tags are described, it mig