On 3/15/10 11:42 AM, Sam Vekemans wrote: > Hi all, > The proposal of > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/snowshed > is still underway, there are a couple of 'yes votes'. > I think http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:covered%3Dyes is more > appropriate. (and it's already different than tunnel=yes) > i concur, and added my vote. i can see, however, a case for more values for covered, e.g.
covered=snowshed covered=building richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
