Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread David Haslam
There are two beta modules that cause an exception in The Sword Project of Windows (1.5.11), if they are selected. Both are under Daily Devotional. * Daily * SME These are the only two that I had to uninstall for this reason. --David Haslam asrael wrote: > > > Am 06.10.2009 um 10:25 schrieb

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread Barry Drake
Hi Chris .. Chris Little wrote: My best guess at what you're referring to is the v11nNRSV and v11nNRSVA modules, which contain versification data only and no Bible text. And maybe even the v11nKJV and v11nKJVA, which are the same, and further have nothing to do with the NKJV. Sorry - I h

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 06.10.2009 um 10:25 schrieb Chris Little: Ben Morgan wrote: I don't currently use installmgr at all, but I think the experimental repository should definitely be removed. Potentially, modules in the experimental repository will cause crashes - possibly leading to the software crashin

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread Chris Little
Barry Drake wrote: Hi Chris ... Chris Little wrote: I created a new repository over the weekend for experimental modules. This repo is intended for front end developers. PLEASE DO NOT DIRECT USERS TO THIS REPOSITORY. It is not for casual users or even very many people on this list. I'

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread Chris Little
Ben Morgan wrote: I don't currently use installmgr at all, but I think the experimental repository should definitely be removed. Potentially, modules in the experimental repository will cause crashes - possibly leading to the software crashing on startup after it is installed (I think the ve

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread Barry Drake
Hi Chris ... Chris Little wrote: I created a new repository over the weekend for experimental modules. This repo is intended for front end developers. PLEASE DO NOT DIRECT USERS TO THIS REPOSITORY. It is not for casual users or even very many people on this list. I'm really excited about

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread Ben Morgan
I don't currently use installmgr at all, but I think the experimental repository should definitely be removed. Potentially, modules in the experimental repository will cause crashes - possibly leading to the software crashing on startup after it is installed (I think the versetreekey modules are li

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread Teus Benschop
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 08:20 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote: > > Is there still a consensus that experimental should be removed from > > masterRepoList.conf? We could add a note field to that .conf and > > label it as "for developers only". A note field might also help > > clarify the purpose o

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-06 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 06.10.2009 um 04:38 schrieb Chris Little: Ok, I'm certainly amenable to removing experimental from masterRepoList.conf. I had imagined that the name "experimental" itself would discourage people from adding this repo and expecting useful content. My concern and request that users not

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-05 Thread Matthew Talbert
> I had imagined that the name "experimental" itself would discourage people > from adding this repo and expecting useful content. I think the issue is that, at least in our implementation, everything in the list is added as a usable repo. I'd have to look to see if that's because of how SWORD is

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-05 Thread Chris Little
Ok, I'm certainly amenable to removing experimental from masterRepoList.conf. I had imagined that the name "experimental" itself would discourage people from adding this repo and expecting useful content. My concern and request that users not be directed to this repository were based on a pra

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-05 Thread Nic Carter
Can I second what Matthew said? The experimental modules repo sounds great (& I can't wait to see how broken our app is for some of those mods!), but access to it should be something where the user has to specifically know about it & manually add it as an install source? And hence not sudd

Re: [sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-05 Thread Matthew Talbert
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Chris Little wrote: > I created a new repository over the weekend for experimental modules. This > repo is intended for front end developers. PLEASE DO NOT DIRECT USERS TO > THIS REPOSITORY. It is not for casual users or even very many people on this > list. This i

[sword-devel] experimental repository & new module release procedures

2009-10-05 Thread Chris Little
I created a new repository over the weekend for experimental modules. This repo is intended for front end developers. PLEASE DO NOT DIRECT USERS TO THIS REPOSITORY. It is not for casual users or even very many people on this list. It will contain three types of modules: 1) Utility modules to