On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 08:20 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote: > > Is there still a consensus that experimental should be removed from > > masterRepoList.conf? We could add a note field to that .conf and > > label it as "for developers only". A note field might also help > > clarify the purpose of the bible.org repo that causes some > > confusion. (This would of course not be a useable field prior to > > 1.6.1--but I assume that's coming fairly soon.) > >
If it stayed in the masterRepoList.conf then any user that wish to have a Bible or commentary that's not yet fully released could have it, and after noticing the label "experimental", he/she should realize that there may be problems. If users are exposed to experimental modules, their feedback could be helpful in taking out the bugs. So, my vote, $0.02 worth, would be to let it remain in the master repository list. Teus. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
