Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-27 Thread Jonathan Morgan
Hi Peter, On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > Just some clarification required: > > There are four places in ./filters where DivineName is somehow being > dealt with > > There is a GBF filter gbfosis.cpp - I think we can safely ignore that. > > There is the big OSIS to HTM

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-27 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Just some clarification required: There are four places in ./filters where DivineName is somehow being dealt with There is a GBF filter gbfosis.cpp - I think we can safely ignore that. There is the big OSIS to HTML filter osishtmlhref.cpp - this is important There is osisplain.cpp - and I do no

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Owens
On 06/25/2011 03:47 PM, ref...@gmx.net wrote: As Jonathan has explained, this is about the tetragrammaton and marking it up is not a matter of niceness, but carries serious meaning. How to render it is a matter entirely separate and might require thought in a fair number of situations. But

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread ref...@gmx.net
As Jonathan has explained, this is about the tetragrammaton and marking it up is not a matter of niceness, but carries serious meaning. How to render it is a matter entirely separate and might require thought in a fair number of situations. But we should enable such thought and not preempt it

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread David (Mailing List Addy)
On Saturday, June 25, 2011 04:57:16 PM ref...@gmx.net wrote: > There is no disagreement. Sorry for top posting, telephone email is > dreadful. Basically I think that the markup needs to be capable of being > handled differently case by case. Some languages have strong print style > traditions, othe

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread David (Mailing List Addy)
On Saturday, June 25, 2011 11:37:29 PM Jonathan Morgan wrote: > Is there anything in the print Bible to distinguish divine name from > non-divine name? I assume the use case for this feature was to note a > difference between divine name and non-divine name in the source text. In > English Bibles

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread ref...@gmx.net
There is no disagreement. Sorry for top posting, telephone email is dreadful. Basically I think that the markup needs to be capable of being handled differently case by case. Some languages have strong print style traditions, others don't. In some languages we essentially try to capture what has

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Owens
n 25, 2011 14:37 Subject: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" Hi, On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Sebastien Koechlin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:52:14PM -0400, DM Smith wrote: > > On 06/24/2011 01:03 PM,

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread ref...@gmx.net
It is not so much to imitate print texts, but to allow different languages to use appropriate solutions. Class is good, descriptive presentation is bad. Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Jonathan Morgan" Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2011 14:37 Subject: [sword-devel]

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread Jonathan Morgan
Hi, On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Sebastien Koechlin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:52:14PM -0400, DM Smith wrote: > > On 06/24/2011 01:03 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > > >Yeah, for sure. We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas? I > > >thought at one time we were supplying a +

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread Sebastien Koechlin
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:52:14PM -0400, DM Smith wrote: > On 06/24/2011 01:03 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > >Yeah, for sure. We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas? I > >thought at one time we were supplying a + size on the first letter or > >something. Any bright ideas welcome. >

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread Jonathan Morgan
On Saturday, June 25, 2011, David (Mailing List Addy) wrote: > On Friday, June 24, 2011 02:52:14 PM DM Smith wrote: >> > Yeah, for sure.  We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas?  I >> > thought at one time we were supplying a + size on the first letter or >> > something.  Any bright idea

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-25 Thread David Haslam
Aren't there some translations in which where the divine name is "LORD", the initial "L" is capitalised, and the "ORD" is printed with small caps? One of the frustrating things in some Bible software is when the "ORD" part gets rendered not only as small caps, but as subscripted small caps, such t

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Hellings
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:46 PM, DM Smith wrote: > > On Jun 24, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:52 PM, DM Smith wrote: >>> On 06/24/2011 01:03 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, for sure.  We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas?  I >>> thoug

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
""ref...@gmx.net"" writes: > Arabic and Chinese don't have small caps So how does content get rendered in those languages? ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to un

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread ref...@gmx.net
Arabic and Chinese don't have small caps Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Greg Hellings" Date: Fri, Jun 24, 2011 22:57 Subject: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread DM Smith
On Jun 24, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:52 PM, DM Smith wrote: >> On 06/24/2011 01:03 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >> >> Yeah, for sure. We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas? I >> thought at one time we were supplying a + size on the first let

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Hellings
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:52 PM, DM Smith wrote: > On 06/24/2011 01:03 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > > Yeah, for sure. We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas? I > thought at one time we were supplying a + size on the first letter or > something. Any bright ideas welcome. > > Is there

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread David (Mailing List Addy)
On Friday, June 24, 2011 02:52:14 PM DM Smith wrote: > > Yeah, for sure. We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas? I > > thought at one time we were supplying a + size on the first letter or > > something. Any bright ideas welcome. > > Is there any reason not to use small caps? I.e. > L

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread DM Smith
On 06/24/2011 01:03 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: Yeah, for sure. We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas? I thought at one time we were supplying a + size on the first letter or something. Any bright ideas welcome. Is there any reason not to use small caps? I.e. Lord becomes Lord?

Re: [sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Yeah, for sure. We also have this problem on swordweb. Any ideas? I thought at one time we were supplying a + size on the first letter or something. Any bright ideas welcome. Troy On 24/06/11 13:48, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > We had a bug report against Xiphos, that changing the base font size

[sword-devel] Font size specification inside

2011-06-24 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
We had a bug report against Xiphos, that changing the base font size when displaying RNKJV causes all text to resize _except_ divine names. That is, module markup contains e.g. Yahushua all over the place. What comes out of the engine for this includes its own font size specification, without rega