O, that's great, Chris, that JSword has that information.
I am after the data only, not after any features from the Sword engine.
Where can the data be found from JSword?
Teus.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Chris Burrell wrote:
> Them JSword does have that. I built it in specifically to be a
Them JSword does have that. I built it in specifically to be able to do
interlinears and parallel text comparisons.
Are you after the data or a feature in the actual Sword engine?
Chris
On 10 Jan 2014 07:18, "Teus Benschop" wrote:
> Thank you, Chris L., for the info. Yes, this versification stu
Thank you, Chris L., for the info. Yes, this versification stuff is hard to
get entirely right, because of the various small variations the individual
translators create.
Chris B., the difference is that the versification says how many verses
each chapter has, and the mapping tell us which verses m
On 10/01/14 07:33, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> XULSword is based on C++ libsword, which means it doesn't work on
> Firefox OS (there is no C-level API for that), nor it works on Windows
> Phone. Also, whole XUL technology is limited to the real Firefox on
> desktop operation systems (it might be possible t
On 09/01/14 17:47, David Haslam wrote:
> We already have two front-ends that are Firefox add-ons.
>
> One is FireBible. The other is xulsword.
I have intentionally spoke about JavaScript not about Firefox (notice
also that Firefox OS despite the name and despite the fact it runs on
Gecko is not fu
No, we don't have this information. There are very few translations for
which this type of data would be accurate, and almost all of those
simply use the KJV versification (or the NRSV/GNT versification). Almost
all translations with non-KJV/NRSV versifications vary in slight and
idiosyncratic
I decided to try using the Sword bindings with python 3 on a system
with both python 2 & 3, and here's what I did to make it work:
1. made the following change to python/CMakeLists.txt:
-FIND_PACKAGE(PythonInterp REQUIRED)
-FIND_PACKAGE(PythonLibs)
+FIND_PACKAGE(PythonInterp 3 REQUIRED)
+FIND_PACK
On 01/09/2014 03:23 PM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
The World English Bible project just reached a major milestone.
Congratulations, and thank you so much for your efforts on this!
Blessings and greetings,
Norbert
___
s
Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
> The World English Bible project just reached a major milestone.
Congratulations, and thank you so much for your efforts on this!
Blessings and greetings,
Norbert
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.
Not sure I understand the difference you're making? JSword has that
information in text form if that's what you are after. I think sword s
information is stored in verse numbers.
On 9 Jan 2014 15:52, "Teus Benschop" wrote:
> In the SWORD library, in the source tarball, in the include folder, ther
Title: signature
The World English Bible project just reached a major milestone. The
complete Old and New Testaments are essentially done. The
Apocrypha/Deuterocanon set is complete, containing all books that
the NRSV with Apocrypha has in its fuller ecumenical edition. The
I would like to add functionality to annotate Bible verses but i can't find
correct tool in libsword. Personal Commentary isn't good for me because it
doesn't cover all entries that user would like to annotate.
I would suggest developing meta v11n that will have layout for all known
canonical and
We already have two front-ends that are Firefox add-ons.
One is FireBible. The other is xulsword.
For the latter, that's in addition to it being available as a Windows EXE.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Windows-Phone-not-Windows-Mobile-tp4653331
In the SWORD library, in the source tarball, in the include folder, there
are many canon_*.h files.
I am looking for verse mapping information.
This is information that maps equivalent verses across different
translation based, not on verse numbers, but on actual content. For example
Gen 31:55 in m
I've always compiled it. Never used a distro of the SWORD lib or tools. It is
easy enough to do, especially w/ cmake.
In Him,
DM Smith
On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:55 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Most distro packages will use shared linkage.
>
> --Greg
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:53 AM, DM
That helps, thanks. Teus.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> If you're able to compile yourself than just set --prefix=~/.local or
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/.local then when you invoke 'make install' the
> files will be placed appropriately inside of that directory. Best of l
If you're able to compile yourself than just set --prefix=~/.local or
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/.local then when you invoke 'make install' the
files will be placed appropriately inside of that directory. Best of luck!
--Greg
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
> Thanks Greg, for
Thanks Greg, for the information. Based on that information, I will also be
looking into compiling the newest Sword tarball on the targeted Ubuntu
release, then install it the way you describe. That should be giving the
very newest in case the Ubuntu or Debian packages contains older versions.
Teus
You should be able to grab the binary deb from any Ubuntu mirror, unpack
the files, and hand-install them to your user directory. I often will
install programs to the folder $HOME/.local/ on systems I do not have
administrative access to. I then modify my environment to add
$HOME/.local/bin to my p
The shared hosting account runs Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS currently, more
specifically Linux 3.8.0-34-generic #49~precise1-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux. If there were a 64 bits package available, that would be
great. The hosting provider is unwilling to install additional packages for
stabil
Most distro packages will use shared linkage.
--Greg
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:53 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> I thought it was statically compiled. At least when I compile on Un*x.
>
> Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos. ;)
>
> On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
>
> David,
>
> So
I thought it was statically compiled. At least when I compile on Un*x.
Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos. ;)
> On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Sorry, this was my mistake. I am looking for "osis2mod" which is part of the
> Sword library.
>
> Teus.
>
>
Teus,
Which version of Linux are you running? There might be a compatible package
available that would be possible to unpack and install into your user
directory.
--Greg
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
> David,
>
> Sorry, this was my mistake. I am looking for "osis2mod" wh
David,
Sorry, this was my mistake. I am looking for "osis2mod" which is part of
the Sword library.
Teus.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:51 PM, David Haslam wrote:
> Teus,
>
> There's a mismatch between your subject and body.
>
> Which are you after? usfm2osis or osis2mod ?
>
> The former is now a
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Chris Burrell"
Date: 9 Jan 2014 08:32
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] module supplied v11n
To: "Familie von Kaehne"
Cc:
These are the modules from Michael K. Can't remember exact number. He has
roughly 200-280 modules, mostly from Papua New Guinea. I wro
Teus,
There's a mismatch between your subject and body.
Which are you after? usfm2osis or osis2mod ?
The former is now a Python script, developed by Chris L.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Statically-compiled-usfm2osis-tp4653342p4653343.html
S
I am looking for a self contained statically compiled 64 bits version of
osis2mod running on Linux.
It is going to be used by Bibledit-Web running on shared hosting account.
That account cannot install system software, and compilers and a linker is
not installed on that account.
I am grateful for
Have you all read about asm.js ?
asm.js is a simple subset of JavaScript that is very easy to optimize,
suitable for use as a compiler target from languages like C and C++.
This article reports on the latest development & its performance compared to
native code.
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/1
Further to Chris Burrell's reply...
BabelPad's Convert Menu for Chinese includes options to convert Simplified
to Traditional & vice versa.
In July 2011, I experimented with this, and did comparisons for the diatheke
dumps from our two Chinese modules.
Details available on request.
The important
Almost as an aside in response to Matej's message.
Have you all read about asm.js ?
asm.js is a simple subset of JavaScript that is very easy to optimize,
suitable for use as a compiler target from languages like C and C++.
This article reports on the latest development & its performance compare
- Forwarded message -
From: "ref...@gmx.net"
To: "Chris Burrell"
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] module supplied v11n
Date: Thu, Jan 9, 2014 00:47
While I can see the benefit of module supplied v11n I am rather astonished
about your suggestion you had 200 modules for which no versificatio
31 matches
Mail list logo
