On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:10:23PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >> Just in case you didn't notice kib committed a fix for i386 thread0 in
> >> r286288 so this may not be needed at all any more which is good news :)
> > If I understund kib fix (and you about ZFS stack requirements) you
> > need
On 04/08/2015 21:24, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:06:55PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 04/08/2015 17:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:30:30AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 03/08/2015 21:48, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:44
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:06:55PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/2015 17:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:30:30AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 03/08/2015 21:48, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov
On 04/08/2015 17:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:30:30AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 03/08/2015 21:48, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/3/15 8:03 P
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:30:30AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2015 21:48, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov
On 03/08/2015 21:48, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
For this change I d
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
For this change I don't want to get into fixi
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >> For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,
> >> which can be done later, just
> >>
On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,
which can be done later, just
to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could
cause a panic
On 03/08/2015 13:03, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,
which can be done later, just
to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could
cause a p
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,
> which can be done later, just
> to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could
> cause a panic.
Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 on
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > I looked at the possibility of making default kernel stack size
> > configurable by a loader tunable, and the issue is that thread0 gets its
> > stack set up too early (locore for i386, hammer_time() for amd64). I.e.,
> > it is
On 03/08/2015 12:19, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:52:21AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Monday, August 03, 2015 11:31:58 AM Steven Hartland wrote:
On 03/08/2015 10:47, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:34:10AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
Author: s
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:19:42PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > The whole thing has missing the point.
> >
> > Changing the default for the entire kernel just because the zfs compat
> > wrappers can't be bothered requesting a suitable value is.. unfortunate..
> > particularly when it i
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:52:21AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Monday, August 03, 2015 11:31:58 AM Steven Hartland wrote:
> > On 03/08/2015 10:47, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:34:10AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > >> Author: smh
> > >> Date: Mon Aug 3 09:34:09 2
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:31:58AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> On 03/08/2015 10:47, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:34:10AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >
> >> Author: smh
> >> Date: Mon Aug 3 09:34:09 2015
> >> New Revision: 286223
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd
On Monday, August 03, 2015 11:31:58 AM Steven Hartland wrote:
> On 03/08/2015 10:47, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:34:10AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >> Author: smh
> >> Date: Mon Aug 3 09:34:09 2015
> >> New Revision: 286223
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/cha
On 03/08/2015 10:47, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:34:10AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
Author: smh
Date: Mon Aug 3 09:34:09 2015
New Revision: 286223
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286223
Log:
Fix KSTACK_PAGES check in ZFS module
The check in
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:34:10AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Author: smh
> Date: Mon Aug 3 09:34:09 2015
> New Revision: 286223
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286223
>
> Log:
> Fix KSTACK_PAGES check in ZFS module
>
> The check introduced by r285946 failed to add t
Author: smh
Date: Mon Aug 3 09:34:09 2015
New Revision: 286223
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286223
Log:
Fix KSTACK_PAGES check in ZFS module
The check introduced by r285946 failed to add the dependency on
opt_kstack_pages.h which meant the default value for the platform
20 matches
Mail list logo
