On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,
which can be done later, just
to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could
cause a panic.
Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ? I.e., would only increasing
the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ? The zfs
threads do request larger stack size, I know this.
Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which
does not boot ?
I think this is a reasonable thing to do. Thread0 (and proc0) are special.
I don't see why giving it a specially sized stack would be a problem.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
