On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > >> For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size, > >> which can be done later, just > >> to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could > >> cause a panic. > > Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ? I.e., would only increasing > > the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ? The zfs > > threads do request larger stack size, I know this. > > > > Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which > > does not boot ? > > I think this is a reasonable thing to do. Thread0 (and proc0) are special. > I don't see why giving it a specially sized stack would be a problem.
This is always do for ARM. May be need increase stack size for Thread0 on ARM too? _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
