0:22.unbound
> +FreeBSD-SA-20:23.ipv6
> +
> +
> +Fix multiple vulnerabilities in sqlite3. [SA-20:22.sqlite]
>
Hi Gordon,
In this (and the others) 20:22 is listed as unbound. I think you wanted sqlite
there?
# Adam
—
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
https://ww
't be the last (in general... no specific
> plans here). =(
Respecting the same env var that other OS's do seems like a reduction in POLA.
Please consider putting a note in one or more of /usr/src/UPDATING,
/usr/ports/UPDATING, and xfce/pkg-message explaining the change and
what people should do to get the old behaviour. They're the best tools
we have for improving POLA.
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> On 18 May, 2017, at 10:53, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 10:43 -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 May, 2017, at 10:24, Glen Barber wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: gjb
>>> Date: Thu May 18 16:24:11 2017
>>> New Revi
also to be supported" or "believed to be supported by
&os; as well:".
>
>
>
> @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@
>
>
> The following Fujitsu &primepower; systems are not tested
> - but believed to
for ZFS .zfs/ directory functionality
> + has been reimplemented. It's not possible now to create a snapshot
Did you want "not" or "now" here?
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org
> + by mkdir under .zfs/snapshot/. That should
-ports.dotTue Jan 10 04:49:59 2017
(r311853)
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ node [color=grey62, style=filled, bgcolo
# Alumni go here.. Try to keep things sorted.
-adamw [label="Adam Weinberger\nad...@freebsd.org\n2002/10/16\n2006/09/25"]
asami [label="Satoshi Asami\nas...@freebsd.or
Remove vestigal references to __alpha__
>
> Replace alpha reference in getconf(1) with amd64 [*]
>
> PR: 211300 [*]
Hi Garrett,
It doesn't look like the contents of r303830 were part of that MFC. I'm not
sure if that was intentional, so this is just a head's up.
> On 6 Feb, 2015, at 12:00, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 06:35:06AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>> On 5 Feb, 2015, at 6:07, Glen Barber wrote:
>> It also notes:
>>
>>> +Source-based upgrades (those based on recompiling the &
the instructions in
> + /usr/src/UPDATING.
Any chance something similar can happen for /usr/src/UPDATING? In the stable/*
and releng/* branches, the how-to-upgrade information appears nearly 2,000
lines down. Maybe:
- Everything from most recent branch, (or most recent - 1?) onward
- "
>> (2014/03/22 @ 1714 EST): Adam Weinberger said, in 1.2K: <<
> >> (2014/03/21 @ 1627 EST): Andrey Chernov said, in 1.1K: <<
> > On 22.03.2014 0:07, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > > /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/route.c:333:7: error: format specifies type
>
netinet6
>> sys/netipx sys/netpfil/pf sys/nfs usr.bin/netstat" from Andrey Chernov <<
Can somebody maybe merge r262819? 10-STABLE is unbuildable on i386 right
now.
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org
_
11 matches
Mail list logo
