There is an optimum radius of about 15mm, below which the bottom end begins to
suffer I’m told.
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archiv
--On 12 April 2018 09:36 +0100 Jack Reynolds
wrote:
> There is an optimum radius of about 15mm, below which the bottom end
> begins to suffer I'm told.
I would guess this is practical rather than theoretical; determined by
a combination of noise (because of the gain required in the
differences)
On 11/04/2018 18:40, Paul Hodges wrote:
...
I wonder how the capsules will compare with those on the SPS-200, given
that the projected cost is a mere fraction of that (if the price quoted
in the video is in Australian dollars, then it's only a quarter of the
price of the SPS-200!).
While I hav
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:12:48AM +0100, Paul Hodges wrote:
> --On 12 April 2018 09:36 +0100 Jack Reynolds
> wrote:
>
> > There is an optimum radius of about 15mm, below which the bottom end
> > begins to suffer I'm told.
>
> I would guess this is practical rather than theoretical; determined
So is a larger radius A-Format mic not a problem then? I always thought the
radius dictated the upper frequency limit for spatial aliasing.
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscrib
