Re: [Sursound] Bizarre

2016-10-30 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 10/28/2016 08:22 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote: Here’s the link to the first “article": https://www.arkamys.com/ambisonic-microphone-ep01/ What a load of bollocks. Four omni capsules spaced closely together will give you... [drum roll]... an

Re: [Sursound] Stand alone recorder with built-in mics

2016-10-30 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 10/27/2016 03:27 AM, Steven Boardman wrote: More product folks. Nothing to do with me, but just came up on the radar https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/twirling720-vr-audio-recorder#/ Love the name. Should be twice as good as 360. Then again, 1440 would be even better. Anyone? But le

Re: [Sursound] Bizarre

2016-10-30 Thread Sebastià V . Amengual
I could be wrong, but as I understand, as far as the distance between the microphones is much smaller than the wavelength, it is possible to obtain first-order microphones with any kind of directional pattern. Thus, at least for a limited frequency range they could create the four cardioid signa

Re: [Sursound] Bizarre

2016-10-30 Thread Steven Boardman
gt; Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20161030/bce24da2/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] Bizarre

2016-10-30 Thread Marc Lavallée
Very interesting and useful. Thanks a lot Sebastià. -- Marc On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:09:14 +0100 Sebastià V. Amengual wrote: > I could be wrong, but as I understand, as far as the distance between > the microphones is much smaller than > the wavelength, it is possible to obtain first-order micr

Re: [Sursound] Bizarre

2016-10-30 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 03:09:14PM +0100, Sebastià V. Amengual wrote: > I could be wrong, but as I understand, as far as the distance > between the microphones is much smaller than > the wavelength, it is possible to obtain first-order microphones > with any kind of directional pattern. Consider

Re: [Sursound] Stand alone recorder with built-in mics

2016-10-30 Thread umashankar manthravadi
HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20161030/5cff32f4/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe h

Re: [Sursound] Bizarre

2016-10-30 Thread Dave Hunt
t: Re: [Sursound] Bizarre And the cardiod mems are actually two omnis and some dsp ! umashankar -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachm

Re: [Sursound] Bizarre

2016-10-30 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 10/30/2016 03:09 PM, Sebastià V. Amengual wrote: I could be wrong, but as I understand, as far as the distance between the microphones is much smaller than the wavelength, it is possible to obtain first-order microphones with any kind of directional pattern. Thus, at least for a limited freque

Re: [Sursound] Bizarre

2016-10-30 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:40:50PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > Also, I think things get even funnier when you consider you don't > have three pairs of omnis, for a differential receiver along each > spatial axis, but rather a tetrahedron of omnis, and the joys of > mapping that to B-format.