[Sursound] Invitation to speak at Euroregio 2016 (Auditory and Multisensory Perception)

didate (VUB / KUL) Vrije Universiteit Brussel ETRO - Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160104/8bc92306/attachment.html> -- next part

[Sursound] Invitation to speak at Euroregio 2016 (Auditory and Multisensory Perception)

e (VUB / KUL) Vrije Universiteit Brussel ETRO - Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160104/68e08e07/attachment.html> -- next part -

[Sursound] Ambisonic recordings and noise reduction - best practise?

Hi, I’ve done some ambisonic recordings of ambience in very quiet environments using the SoundField SPS200 mic and a SoundDevice 788T recorder. The resulting recordings are A-format, and I use the SoundField SPS200 plugin to convert the A-format recordings to B-format. The resulting recordings

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic recordings and noise reduction - best practise?

--On 04 January 2016 21:17 +0100 Trond Lossius wrote: > 1) I treat the original A-format recordings, and afterwards I convert > the processed files to B-format I have done this - when I had a situation that one channel only of the A-format contained the noise. I was not aware of any anomalies a

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic recordings and noise reduction - best practise?

> Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https:

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic recordings and noise reduction - best practise?

t;> Sursound@music.vt.edu >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, >> edit account or options, view archives and so on. >> > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.