PS. of course amplitudes of the signal should also stay the same On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Andres Cabrera <mantaray...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would guess that as long as the phases of the remaining components in > the encoded signals are not significantly affected, there should be no > spatial artifacts introduced (only the spectral artifacts should be > present). Not sure however how much phases are affected by denoisers. > > Cheers, > Andrés > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Paul Hodges <pwh-surro...@cassland.org> > wrote: > >> --On 04 January 2016 21:17 +0100 Trond Lossius <trond.loss...@bek.no> >> wrote: >> >> > 1) I treat the original A-format recordings, and afterwards I convert >> > the processed files to B-format >> >> I have done this - when I had a situation that one channel only of the >> A-format contained the noise. I was not aware of any anomalies arising >> from this (and I did go looking), but I guess my typical recordings >> with a lot of ambience might not show any problems clearly. >> >> Alternatively, both Adobe Audition and Sony Sound Forge and >> SpectraLayers can handle multi-channel files, and have useful noise >> reduction facilities. I have used each, and again have heard no >> decoding problems arising from their use. >> >> Paul >> >> -- >> Paul Hodges >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sursound mailing list >> Sursound@music.vt.edu >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, >> edit account or options, view archives and so on. >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160104/c7ce8713/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
