Hi,
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:50:00 +0200
From: David Worrall
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Hi All,
I'm away from my back-up of this list (*) so please forgive if this
has been answered before, but
Is there - on the market, or in other form - a setup system/tool
that auto configur
While -16.9 might keep you safe, a better option might be -20 dBFS. Gives some
headroom in case you need it. Also, many consumer playback devices may not
handle full scale output.
> On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:00 AM, sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote:
>
> Send Sursound mailing list submissions t
dw wrote:
On 22/09/2013 12:51, Andy Furniss wrote:
Hi
I do not have a 7.1 sound system so can't actually test this, also
as may become apparent I don't know much about sound :-)
I would be grateful if someone could correct/confirm the
following.
If I were to mix down a digital 7ch to mono I h
Ken Landers wrote:
While -16.9 might keep you safe, a better option might be -20 dBFS.
Gives some headroom in case you need it. Also, many consumer
playback devices may not handle full scale output.
Interesting, I am not a producer of anything as such, but do see that a
lot of digital music an
t;https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130923/a357f99b/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
In years past, a number of systems has issues with intra-sample peaks. While a
technical 0 dBFS cleared, the interpolated level between the peaks would cause
distortion. From a best practices for broadcast point of view, my colleagues
and I have just tried to steer clear of any overs, sample-w
