Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

Hi Tim, Indeed, SNR is poor at low frequencies for this sort of technique as it relies on the phase difference between the two capsules as produced by their separation. The separation can't be too large as once it gets over half a wavelength the phase starts wrapping around but this means that at l

Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130109/4a9de64c/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 6737 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: <https://mail.music.vt.

Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

"... beyond 3D sound" - my goodness! Just how many dimensions? - this is going to upset the theoretical physicists. But if they are clever enough to do that, why can't they actually speak English? Dr. Peter Lennox School of Technology, Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology University of Derby,

Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

An open paper on directional mics http://www.iwaenc.org/proceedings/2001/main/data/buck.pdf I had a idea that I could use 2 close mounted mics (o) for Upper frequency ranges and a longer distance between 2 additional elements (x) to have better signal to noise ratio for the lower frequency band

Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

Peter Lennox wrote: > "... beyond 3D sound" - my goodness! Just how many dimensions? - this is > going to upset the theoretical physicists. > "New Dimensions for Ambisonics" Shameless plug ... (not least for hyperspherical harmonics ...

Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

Peter Lennox wrote: "... beyond 3D sound" - my goodness! Just how many dimensions? - this is going to upset the theoretical physicists. But if they are clever enough to do that, why can't they actually speak English? Dr. Peter Lennox School of Technology, Faculty of Arts, Design and Technolo