Why would I claim something that I haven't finished? To put
> > the pressure on so that I do finish!
> >
> > Eric
> > ___
> > Sursound mailing list
> > Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/
Hi
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 14:18:07 +0530
From: umashankar mantravadi
at home now i am setting up an eight speaker system, about 50 watts
per channel, with a total cost including an eight channel d/a of
less than 400 USD. i only have to wire up the eighth loudspeaker
(why does inertia kic
f a practical, affordable second-order
> > soundfield microphone. Of course it's not done yet, and perhaps I'm talking
> > through my hat. Why would I claim something that I haven't finished? To put
> > the pressure on so that I do finish!
> >
> > Eric
> > _
If the Core Sound 4Mic were to appear, then it would be possible to record
10 channels on a Tascam DR-680, by taking the four-channel SP/DIF output of
the 4Mic into channels 7/8 of the Tascam. Admittedly, six would be at 96kHz
and four at 48kHz, but I would think that it should be possible to or
On 5 Mar 2011, at 19:53, Paul Hodges wrote:
> If the Core Sound 4Mic were to appear
Sadly, this isn't going to happen. Len has had to refund all those who paid a
deposit as he can't get the project off the ground for various reasons.
Regards,
John
___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part -- An HTML attachment was
scrubbed... URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110305/5b14d8fd/
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:57:52AM -0800, Eric Benjamin wrote:
> > would be happy with eight channels. (can i synch two zoom H2s?
>
> I was, in fact, fishing for your opinions on the number of channels.
> Personally, although I retain some sort of purist perspective that a
> complete
> 9-chan
g interesting to the Ambisonics symposium > > 2011
>> > > in
>>Kentucky?
>> > > > I'm planning on bring a prototype of a practical, affordable >
>>second-order soundfield microphone. Of course it's not done yet, and >
>>perhaps
&g
On Mar 6 2011, Eric Benjamin wrote:
In a case such as the FA101 I'd be very tempted to make an internal
conversion to a 10-channel (analog) interface. I'm not at all sure what
the internal structure is like for the FA101.
So would I and that's probably what I will do when I need it :-). The