dw wrote:
http://www.gbcasa.org/cms/audio/Griesinger-Binaural-Hearing-EarCanals-Headphones.ppt
http://www.stereophile.com/content/spacethe-final-frontier-letters-2
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/researchanddevelopment/2013/03/listen-up-binaural-sound.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/r
On 11/11/2013 22:25, dw wrote:
On 11/11/2013 15:39, Andy Furniss wrote:
dw wrote:
There of plenty of reasons why Ambisonics and binaural should not
work well, but it can sound ok to me on My £11 cans..
Interesting can you expand a bit?
Here are some links:
Try again...
http://www.gbcasa
On 11/11/2013 15:39, Andy Furniss wrote:
dw wrote:
There of plenty of reasons why Ambisonics and binaural should not
work well, but it can sound ok to me on My £11 cans..
Interesting can you expand a bit?
Here are some links:
http://www.gbcasa.org/cms/audio/Griesinger-Binaural-Hearing-EarCa
ITU made a recommendation (in around 1992-94) for surround speaker
layouts. It is called "ITU-R BS.775-3"
http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BS.775-3-201208-I
I am not aware of any specific _standard_ for the placement of
surround sound speakers.
Many have followed the ITU recommendation, for exampl
[Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1
Well, people seem to agree that -30º is LF, (+)30º is RF.
-30º and 330º seems to be the same, so what?
(Kind of annoyed! Could we agree on a recommendation that positive elevation
figures < should be > located in the upper hemisphere, negative ele
-Original Message-
From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Stefan
Schreiber
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 9:57 AM
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1
Well, people seem to agree that -30º is LF, (+)30º is RF.
-30º and
Well, people seem to agree that -30º is LF, (+)30º is RF.
-30º and 330º seems to be the same, so what?
(Kind of annoyed! Could we agree on a recommendation that positive
elevation figures < should be > located in the upper hemisphere,
negative elevation somewhere "down"? Just to avoid any fur
Richard Dobson:
there is also the CDP MultiChannel Toolkit
Yes, thanks for that Richard. It was only last week when I used Interlx
for another thing. Very powerful and fast, even though I am not very good
with command line applications.
Anyway, Left Front of my samples seemed to be the only fa
dw wrote:
There of plenty of reasons why Ambisonics and binaural should not
work well, but it can sound ok to me on My £11 cans..
Interesting can you expand a bit?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4elj3wj9wzd9rr2/Untitled.mp3
May I ask how you made that and which hrtf?
I've got that somewhere so
On 11/11/2013 14:34, Eero Aro wrote:
David Wareing wrote:
Can't any of you guys actually play it!
Actually I find that a little bit amusing. :-)
Sorry.
But there really is something wrong with my files.
I think I need to delete all of the files from Dropbox.
First: A file player in Audiomulc
On 11/11/2013 14:34, Eero Aro wrote:
David Wareing wrote:
Can't any of you guys actually play it!
Actually I find that a little bit amusing. :-)
Sorry.
The pleasure is alll mine!
But there really is something wrong with my files.
I think I need to delete all of the files from Dropbox.
Fi
David Wareing wrote:
Can't any of you guys actually play it!
Actually I find that a little bit amusing. :-)
Sorry.
But there really is something wrong with my files.
I think I need to delete all of the files from Dropbox.
First: A file player in Audiomulch doesn't open or play my files,
befor
On 11/11/2013 12:48, Eero Aro wrote:
Dave Malham:
Oh - I see, the naming of the files implies LF and simultaneously
that it
is 330 degrees...which is it, Eero?
The Harpex display shows it (LF 330) at RF 30 deg.. Can't any of you
guys actually play it!
There of plenty of reasons why Ambiso
Dave Malham:
Oh - I see, the naming of the files implies LF and simultaneously that it
is 330 degrees...which is it, Eero?
LF.
Funnily though, Dave. I made it with your B-Pan plugin.
The Azimuth control of the plugin at 330 degrees points to Left Front.
Eero
_
Oh - I see, the naming of the files implies LF and simultaneously that it
is 330 degrees...which is it, Eero?
Dave
On 11 November 2013 12:05, Dave Malham wrote:
> Umm - it should be on the right - degrees in Ambisonics are not given as
> in navigational systems. They go anticlockwise, with
Umm - it should be on the right - degrees in Ambisonics are not given as in
navigational systems. They go anticlockwise, with 90 degrees being due left
and 270 being due right.
Dave
On 10 November 2013 23:15, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Eero Aro wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the correction Andy! Shame
I don't have a proper ambisonic set up, but can listen with hrtfs using
ATK + Supercollider.
To me this one sounds on the right rather than the left.
I hope someone else would also give it a try and tell us, where they
hear it coming from.
It isn't a bad idea to use an Ambisonic setup for an A
Eero Aro wrote:
Thanks for the correction Andy! Shame on me...
:-) thanks for taking the time to make these.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22100835/LF_330_dgr.wav
I don't have a proper ambisonic set up, but can listen with hrtfs using
ATK + Supercollider.
To me this one sounds on t
Thanks for the correction Andy! Shame on me...
If any Mac-user on the list can give Alvin some advice, how to download
the files, please tell him. I don't know. In the PC you click with the right
mouse button and select "save target"
Now uploading the LF and RF signals:
https://dl.dropboxus
ITU775 has FL/R at 30 degrees not 45.
Oops. Where's that RED smiley??? I should have known and
remembered that.
I don't know what I was thinking. I'll make new files at +/- 30.
Eero
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.v
Eero Aro wrote:
I am afraid I binned the discussion thread about the test signals.
However, if anybody's interested, I made quickly a couple of files.
I panned a pink noise pulse train into the speaker directions
of ITU775, the 5.1 layout.
The files are 44.1 kHz/16 bit four channel wav:s. The Z
I am afraid I binned the discussion thread about the test signals.
However, if anybody's interested, I made quickly a couple of files.
I panned a pink noise pulse train into the speaker directions
of ITU775, the 5.1 layout.
The files are 44.1 kHz/16 bit four channel wav:s. The Z channel
has no c
22 matches
Mail list logo
