Jim,
I've used VAC, but never for 7.1. Eugene used to be quite helpful, if you reach
out to him.
I must admin that I largely abandoned VAC in favor of the VB-Audio cables and
VoiceMeeter. VoiceMeeter comes in several versions, which support
multi-channel devices. Also, Vincent Burel (author)
That's really good!
Michael Graves
mgra...@mstvp.com
o: (713) 861-4005
c: (713) 201-1262
sip:mgra...@mjg.onsip.com
-Original Message-
From: Sursound On Behalf Of Jens Ahrens
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 11:04 AM
To: Sursound
Subject: [Sursound] Binaural rendering of an Eigenmike recordi
On Android there's Audio Tool from JJ Bunn. It's a great RTA with tone & sweep
generation.
Michael Graves
mgra...@mstvp.com
o: (713) 861-4005
c: (713) 201-1262
sip:mgra...@mjg.onsip.com
-Original Message-
From: Sursound On Behalf Of jack reynolds
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 10:30 A
Stephan,
I stand corrected. I'm not political, but I definitely do lean toward open
source where possible.
The only exposure I've had to EVS is to notice that it's been deployed by
T-Mobile USA as a late stage part of their LTE rollout.
In contrast, just about everything I use daily is Opus-ca
Perhaps "pinnacle" is a bit of an over statement, but the point is sound.
EVS is quite capable, but note that that entire presentation makes no mention
of Opus at all. One arises from the 3GPP the other from the IETF. Fundamentally
different groups, with very different perspectives.
Like AMR be
Chris,
Actually, I too come from a broadcast background, having installed graphics
systems into production and master controls for over 25 years. I completely
appreciate the demand for hard real-time and zero latency.
I've tracked Opus since its earliest days in the IETF CODEC working group. Th
The RF issue of range, carrier frequency, channel width is quite separate from
the deliverable audio path.
The Opus audio codec has revolutionized audio coding. It's able to deliver
full-bandwidth audio at bitrates not much more than what was once typical of a
telephone call. This means that th
When considering wireless links, there are three domains possible:
- Analog
- Digital, not IP passed; DECT, BT, proprietary.
- Digital, IP-based; Wi-Fi, LTE, Wimax.
If latency is the concern I think that non-IP based approaches may have an
inherent advantage.
Michael Graves
mgra...@mstvp.com
ht
Yes, my concern is for live/real-time situations. No post-prod.
Michael Graves
mgra...@mstvp.com
http://www.mgraves.org
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mgra...@mjg.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
-Original Message-
From: Sursound On Behalf Of David Pickett
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 2:22
Agreed. Most of what I think of as the "local signal processing" is quite
speedy. Packetization delay is never less than 20 ms. Transmission delay
dependent upon the network and distance. Poorly designed network elements lead
to buffer bloat, which increases latency dramatically.
The very lates
Marc,
Some time ago I agreed to give a trade show presentation about Polycom's
HDVoice codecs (Siren 7, Siren 14) being released under a license making it
possible to use them with the asterisk open source telephone software.
In the way of dog-fooding the presentation, I tried to deliver it v
Marc,
I'm well and truly intimate with WebRTC. The trouble with IP-based connectivity
is then latency involved with packetization. DECT and BT links don't suffer
this, but they tend to be bandwidth constrained (especially microphone freq
response.)
It's surprising that there are very few head
Marc,
This is very interesting to me. Did you do this using Wi-Fi or some other
wireless scheme?
What I've been seeking is a low-cost, low-latency wireless solution for a
headset.
We have good, full-bandwidth solutions for wireless microphones. Also for
wireless performance monitors. Nothing
See also Dolby Atmos. Yet another triumph of marketing over reality. Dolby is
especially good in that arena.
Michael Graves
mgra...@mstvp.com
http://www.mgraves.org
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mgra...@mjg.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
-Original Message-
From: Sursound On Behalf Of
14 matches
Mail list logo
