Oh, and a couple of other tips for anyone wanting to use condoms for
protecting microphones - wipe as much of the lubricant off as you can
before use (it's a b***er to remove from microphone) and use the
featherlite variety for maximum acoustic transparence.
Dave
On 19 February 2013 21:46,
the worm-mic reminds me of this installation in Brazil "Som da
terra" (sound of the earth) at the garden/gallery "Inhotim" - it's by
American artist Doug Aitken - where 5 mics are lowered 202m down into
the earth. Here's a video showing the installation and an EV re20
protected in a plastic water b
The trouble with the sort of materials used in condoms is that they
are inherently stretchy. Under any sort of pressure (more than a quite
small depth of water) the material presses through any holes and
either (a) rips or be (b) comes into contact with the diaphragm which
is potentially almost as
Absolutely!
Dave
On 19 February 2013 12:49, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:54:25AM +, Dave Malham wrote:
>
>> The trouble with Angelo's kit is that it's not really "hi-fi".
>> Works well for what it was designed for (noise pollution research) but
>> not really g
Needless to say, it would be even more interesting if they actually
posted the IRs somewhere! If they have, it is very well hidden.
Richard Dobson
On 19/02/2013 17:28, Martin Leese wrote:
...
Also, it looks like the University of Salford
have already measured IRs of the original
Stonehenge
David Worrall wrote:
> Subject: [Sursound] Ambisonic hydrophone?
> Does anone know of such a beast?
> (I thought of putting the TetraMic in a plastic bag, but I'm not sure Len
> would approve :-)
>
> Or how one might go about building one...
> Failing which, does anyone have a recommendation on a
> Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
>> Don't know what Len will think of it, but putting a Tetramic
>> (or any such mic) in a plastic bag isn't likely to produce
>> anything usable. Basic problem is that the acoustic impedance
>> of water is around 3400 times higher than that of air, so the
>> water/air int
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> Don't know what Len will think of it, but putting a Tetramic
> (or any such mic) in a plastic bag isn't likely to produce
> anything usable. Basic problem is that the acoustic impedance
> of water is around 3400 times higher than that of air, so the
> water/air interface w
Gerard Lardner wrote:
> Here's a suggestion: a place that is publicly-accessible, but is under
> threat of being demolished. It's Achill Henge, a modern copy of much of
> Stonehenge but built on Achill Island, off the west coast of Ireland.
There are a number of Stonehenge replicas
dotted around
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:54:25AM +, Dave Malham wrote:
> The trouble with Angelo's kit is that it's not really "hi-fi".
> Works well for what it was designed for (noise pollution research) but
> not really good enough for serious audio.
It was primarily designed to find the direction of
and
> > reserves the right to monitor email traffic. If you believe this email
> was
> > sent to you in error, please notify the sender and delete this email.
> > Please direct any concerns to info...@derby.ac.uk.
> > ___
> > Sur
u believe this email was
> > sent to you in error, please notify the sender and delete this email.
> > Please direct any concerns to info...@derby.ac.uk.
> > ___
> > Sursound mailing list
> > Sursound@music.vt.edu
>
tor email traffic. If you believe this email was
> sent to you in error, please notify the sender and delete this email.
> Please direct any concerns to info...@derby.ac.uk.
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://
ist
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
--
07580951119
augustine.leudar.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130219/d21ed42b/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Just a quick one:
It seems to me that a dome could be interesting used as a kind of wavefield
synthesis device.
Domes have the interesting property of focussing sound at a point that is
opposite the source, as it were. So you can create a 'holosonic' point source
right next to someone's ear
D
On 02/18/2013 02:58 PM, Michael Chapman wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
I'm interesting to buy a Sound Field Microphone but I don't have any
experience in this field. Could you recommend me some models or brands
according to your experience?
There are many on here more expert than I.
But to ge
Angelo's paper relating to this is at
http://www.angelofarina.it/Public/UAM-2011/
Dave
On 19 February 2013 04:03, Marc Lavallée wrote:
> umashankar manthravadi a écrit :
>> angelo farina has exactly the beast you are looking for. he had a
>> power point presentation describing its use here
Hi,
The trouble with Angelo's kit is that it's not really "hi-fi".
Works well for what it was designed for (noise pollution research) but
not really good enough for serious audio. Because it's based on
differencing omni's to generate directional responses it has a
relatively limited bandwidth a
18 matches
Mail list logo
